Race and the Politics of Deception
eBook - ePub

Race and the Politics of Deception

The Making of an American City

Christopher Mele

Share book
  1. 208 pages
  2. English
  3. ePUB (mobile friendly)
  4. Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub

Race and the Politics of Deception

The Making of an American City

Christopher Mele

Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations

About This Book

What is the relationship between race and space, and how do racial politics inform the organization and development of urban locales? In Race and the Politics of Deception, Christopher Mele unpacks America’s history of dealing with racial problems through the inequitable use of public space. Mele focuses on Chester, Pennsylvania—a small city comprised of primarily low-income, black residents, roughly twenty miles south of Philadelphia. Like many cities throughout the United States, Chester is experiencing post-industrial decline. A development plan touted as a way to “save” the city, proposes to turn one section into a desirable waterfront destination, while leaving the rest of the struggling residents in fractured communities. Dividing the city into spaces of tourism and consumption versus the everyday spaces of low-income residents, Mele argues, segregates the community by creating a racialized divide. While these development plans are described as socially inclusive and economically revitalizing, Mele asserts that political leaders and real estate developers intentionally exclude certain types of people—most often, low-income people of color. Race and the Politics of Deception provides a revealing look at how our ever-changing landscape is being strategically divided along lines of class and race.

Frequently asked questions

How do I cancel my subscription?
Simply head over to the account section in settings and click on “Cancel Subscription” - it’s as simple as that. After you cancel, your membership will stay active for the remainder of the time you’ve paid for. Learn more here.
Can/how do I download books?
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
What is the difference between the pricing plans?
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlego’s features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan you’ll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
What is Perlego?
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, we’ve got you covered! Learn more here.
Do you support text-to-speech?
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Is Race and the Politics of Deception an online PDF/ePUB?
Yes, you can access Race and the Politics of Deception by Christopher Mele in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Social Sciences & Urban Sociology. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.

Information

Publisher
NYU Press
Year
2017
ISBN
9781479801114

1

Race Strategies and the Politics of Urban Development

Each day tens of thousands of people pass through the city of Chester, Pennsylvania, making their way to destinations along the mid-Atlantic seaboard from Boston, Massachusetts, to Washington, D.C. Interstate 95 and Amtrak’s Northeast Regional passenger rail line cut right through Chester, and most travelers, speeding along in cars or in trains, are oblivious to yet another blurry patch of redbrick row houses and old, abandoned factories seen repeatedly along their routes. The same holds true for most commuters, shoppers, and others who live in Greater Philadelphia and have very few reasons to think about (much less stop in) Chester. For many of them, Chester is the city “that used to be nice,” a forgotten, dangerous, and mostly deserted place to be avoided, or a highway marker just south of Philadelphia, north of the Delaware state line, and on the edge of leafy and very wealthy Delaware County.
Since 2005 local economic development officials, politicians, business leaders, and developers have worked tirelessly to make Chester less a place to drive through, ignore, or intentionally avoid and more of a destination for middle-class visitors and eventually residents. Their strategy has been to capitalize on the city’s location along major transportation arteries and open a riverfront casino, a waterfront esplanade park, and a soccer stadium for a major league expansion team financed by a mix of public dollars, tax abatements, and private investment. Suburban Delaware Valley gamblers now flock to the casino in great numbers, quickly moving from the Interstate highway to a covered parking garage. Soccer fans see Chester as home to their team, the Philadelphia Union, and celebrate the new stadium as proof of the growing popularity of the sport in the United States. Chester’s revival appears on track—as long as all eyes remain focused on the new developments along the waterfront and are not diverted by the crumbling neighborhoods nearby.
Map of Chester and the Eastern Seaboard of the United States.
The casino and the stadium sit in striking visual and social contrast to the rest of Chester, the small city left behind long ago—the city people travel through at high speeds, the city people ignore, or, as they have for decades, consciously avoid. Among the residential streets and in the downtown core, the consequences of decades of political neglect and economic decline are readily apparent. The city’s landscape is peppered with dilapidated but still occupied row houses, countless empty storefronts, and abandoned lots, with an occasional corner grocery and a small number of bars, taverns, and liquor stores. Of the thirty-six thousand people who live in Chester, 80 percent of whom are black, more than a third are “officially” poor, and a quarter over the age of twenty-five have earned less than a high school diploma. Chester consistently ranks high in official federal and state statistics for street gang activity, assaults and homicides, poorly performing schools, long-term unemployment, and sagging community health levels. In February 2015 Neighborhood Scout, an Internet website that provides crime, school, and real estate data for cities and neighborhoods across the United States, ranked Chester the second most dangerous city in the country.1 Chester is Pennsylvania’s poorest city and is located in the state’s wealthiest county.
Map of the Chester waterfront.
For most of Chester’s poor, black residents, the leisure enclave rising along the waterfront is the source of many changes but few benefits to their daily lives. The casino and the stadium employ residents but primarily in low-wage service sector jobs—as janitors, security guards, and restaurant staff. For most, the waterfront is an off-limits enclave meant for suburbanites to gamble, see a soccer game, or attend a corporate-sponsored event. A casino and a Major League Soccer stadium can hardly be considered meaningful urban revitalization for a disadvantaged city with crumbling infrastructure and no supermarket, “big box” store, or thriving small business district. As a twenty-seven-year-old resident told a New York Times reporter covering the city’s revival, “We’ve got a casino, a prison and now a stadium but we don’t have a recreation center or even a McDonald’s in this city.”2 If anything, the waterfront has further confined its residents to the inner city, as past uses of the waterfront—from hanging out and meeting up to barbequing and fishing—are now unwelcome or simply prohibited. Today, high-tech surveillance and new crime control initiatives police the public spaces along the waterfront and increasingly, the city proper. For young people, particularly young black males, ordinary behaviors such as hanging out or congregating on a street corner, have become coded as suspicious and potentially threatening to the success of the city’s regeneration. In the politics of urban development, the residents of Chester themselves seem to stand in the way of the city’s reinvention as a destination for middle-class suburbanites.
Even though Chester’s black community feels left behind, further marginalized, and increasingly scrutinized, city officials and developers are quick to contend otherwise. They argue that the new Chester promises residential, work, and entertainment spaces open and accessible to all—provided they can afford to participate. They claim waterfront redevelopment benefits the entire city despite the fact that it provides few tangible resources to tackle long-standing social problems or to meet needs prioritized by the community. Infused with a language that celebrates the allure of the “free market” and economic capital, the city’s future is shaped by leisure activities, spectacles, and consumption, as evidenced by its “rediscovery” by tourists, visitors, and eventually residents from varied, albeit mostly white middle-class, backgrounds. The new Chester is a more socially inclusive city than the Chester of the past. To claim otherwise is to remain stuck in outdated and failed ideas of urban renewal in which institutional racism, bias, and discrimination were recognized among the main causes of urban poverty. Chester has moved beyond that, embracing a post-racial, nonpolitics of urban development, where the winner is “the city” and the losers are unfortunate individuals—but not entire communities.
Populations of Chester and Delaware County, 1900–2014.
Black population of Chester, 1900–2014.
This image of Chester as a city embracing all things entrepreneurial and welcoming diversity helps legitimize the current progrowth model of urban development politics in which most of the city’s residents are left out in the cold. Race—or more precisely in this case the denial of the salience of race and racism—serves as a useful strategy to normalize a city’s ambitions for economic development at the expense of meaningful community development. The ideology of racial color blindness sorts out and makes sense of the apparent disconnect between the everyday realities of the inner city and the upscale ambitions of the adjacent waterfront.
This book focuses on how local political leaders, developers, the real estate industry, and other powerful stakeholders intentionally and strategically employ the ideologies and rhetoric of race to facilitate and legitimize certain types of urban development and to exclude others. In the current progrowth politics of urban development, the ideology of color blindness comprises a race strategy that facilitates exclusionary urban redevelopment and, in turn, marks a clear distinction between economic and community development.3 Chester’s redevelopment is meant to attract middle-class, suburban consumers. Redevelopment is not meant to address the collective needs of poor black residents of a city reeling from decades of racial segregation and deindustrialization. This exclusion of community needs is enabled by the ideology of color blindness, which is politically useful because it rejects the contemporary relevance of systematic racism and explains urban inequality as the product of “nonracial dynamics.”4 The social problems of urban poverty, inferior housing, chronic unemployment, and deficient education are largely attributable to individuals or their collective, cultural deficiencies but not to institutional or systemic racism. The race strategy of color blindness provides ideological cover, however thin, for urban development policies and practices that exclude and further marginalize the minority poor without the appearance of doing so.
Color-blind racial ideology is strategic to Chester’s progrowth politics. The economic and social problems of the inner city are seen as the remaining vestiges of inefficient or hindered market forces or the private and unfortunate consequences of the choices and behaviors of residents themselves. The city’s poor black residents are less a community or constituency than a collection of individuals who either comply with the goals of contemporary urban development—as consumers, low-wage workers in the waterfront facilities, or simply bystanders (who neither participate nor stand in the way of revitalization)—or they are obstacles and regarded as potential security threats. The minority inner city, then, is redefined not as a place replete with systematic discrimination and exclusion but as a post-racial realm hamstrung by the deficiencies of individual self-sufficiency, responsibility for one’s social welfare, and participation in the market economy. The reimagined inner city as a space devoid of problems caused by racism and racial discrimination is not epiphenomenal to contemporary urban development, it is at its core. And Chester, like many other American cities, is currently reimagined in this very way. As told in this book, Chester’s past and present are consistently shaped and defined by the different uses of race as a strategy in the local politics of urban development.

Employing Race Strategies in Urban Change

The use of color blindness to shore up the stark disconnect between Chester’s waterfront economic development and the minority city’s community underdevelopment is but the most recent occurrence of a long-established pattern of employing race in the politics of urban development. Drawing on the history of Chester and its suburbs, this book examines how the systematic and intentional employment of race shapes urban and metropolitan spaces in older, decline belt cities of the Northeast and Midwest. Race does not merely serve as an ideological setting or context in which urban development unfolds. Instead, the rhetoric and discourses about race and racism are intentionally fused to the wide range of local political processes linked to city development—from the early formation of the urban ghetto, to suburbanization and inner city decline, to more recent attempts at revitalization. Race strategies, then, are formative in the sense that rhetoric, representations, and discourses of race are manipulated and employed by key power holders to facilitate and legitimize certain kinds of urban change over others.5
As the chapters in this book recount, the use of race strategies is not exceptional but forms a normalized part of doing business in the spatial development of cities and suburbs over the past century. Repeatedly, race strategies have proven to be a useful and efficient means for local political leaders and private actors to push through, accelerate, and profit from profound changes in the urban-suburban landscape. They remain effective largely because race—or more precisely, fictions about race—consistently resonate in the public consciousness, even as their meanings continue to change over time. As W. E. B. Du Bois warned in 1903, “The problem of the twentieth century is the problem of the color-line.” But like most social problems, the color line in the United States has transformed in ways both intended and unforeseen, stemming from popular collective action, political economic changes, and shifts in cultural and ideological frames. Throughout the long century, issues of race—fictitious and otherwise—have continued to resonate powerfully in the media, on college campuses, in national politics, and in the local politics of space.
In the United States, the history of urban development reveals the enduring significance of race. At the city-suburb level, racial divisions are visible in most aspects of contemporary society, including policing and criminal justice, education, health care, access to financial capital, and social service provision. Progress has been made in narrowing certain dimensions of the racial divide, as evidenced by limited and uneven declines in racial segregation and in the public intolerance of blatant racial prejudice.6 However, whether measurable racial segregation is slowly disappearing or is sustained in new, elusive ways rests on a literal, demographic interpretation of the racial divide. Such a view neglects the ideologies and rhetoric of race and racism, another dimension of the racial divide and one that can be wielded or employed strategically to shape metropolitan development. While the meanings and ideologies of race and the black-white divide have been and continue to be redefined, they nonetheless are consistently used to influence the direction, limits and possibilities of urban change.
The significance of race to the way cities are shaped and formed is not easily severed from the importance of social class inequalities. But in the politics of urban development, race is symbolically and discursively separated from class; issues of race are employed in their own right as a strategic means for local elites and governments to shape and advance the direction of metropolitan change. Class inequalities shape urban restructuring, from suburbanization to abandonment to revitalization. Yet urban restructuring is imagined, worked out, legitimated, and reconciled in an urban politics that consistently relies on the wielding and, more often than not, cynical manipulation of race and the racial divide. This book’s focus on the strategic quality of race is not to deny or downplay the significance of other dimensions of race and racism to urban inequalities but rather to argue the opposite: that race so clearly, consistently, and problematically resonates in American popular culture that it is a highly useful sociocultural prism through which the politics of urban development is represented, understood, and acted on. Urban inequality and division, Georg Simmel reminds us, “is not a spatial fact with sociological consequences, but a sociological fact that forms itself spatially.”7 The utility of race in the politics of urban development will not disappear as long as the fiction of race remains a powerful (and useful) ideological basis for the way Americans perceive and react to their cities and suburbs.
The use of race in the politics of urban development has lasting chilling effects on minority communities. The utility of race strategies relies on the distortion and manipulation of race, racial groups, and purported racial behaviors. The purpose of this book is not to critique the fictive content of racial rhetoric and discourses per se but to trace their utility as a strategic means to legitimize and push through certain forms of urban change over others. Nonetheless, the stories recounted in this book document how urban politics draws from the rhetoric, ideologies, and fictions of race in an attempt to silence or speak authoritatively on behalf of “a black community” and to render invisible the actual diversity of those who reside in the city. Too often, the “noise” of urban politics drowns out the voices of various grassroots proponents of community-focused development. As the following chapters show, race strategies have often thwarted the efforts of community-based networks to shape a more progressive future for the city at different points in its history. But it would be a mistake to assume that the often-stigmatizing discourses that constitute race strategies position black residents solely as “victims” or passive agents of larger, more powerful forces. As the details in the following chapters also reveal, Chester’s black residents organized and promoted their own vision of a livable city at various points and accomplished much in ways both spectacular and mundane, given the context of larger political and economic circumstances. Grassroots social movements, activist churches, local civil rights associations, block associations, and community organizations consistently fought for their constituents against the narrow agenda of powerful stakeholders in city development. The wielding (and manipulation) of race in the politics of urban development does not eliminate community populism and everyday meaningful practices on the ground in black communities. Inde...

Table of contents