PART 1
WHO WERE THE AMAZONS?
1
ANCIENT PUZZLES AND MODERN MYTHS
In olden times, the earth thundered with the pounding of horsesâ hooves. In that long ago age, women would saddle their horses, grab their lances, and ride forth with their men folk to meet the enemy in battle on the steppes. The women of that time could cut out an enemyâs heart with their swift, sharp swords. Yet they also comforted their men and harbored great love in their heartsâŠ. After the frenzied battle, Queen Amezan leaned down from her saddle and realized in despair that the warrior she had killed was her beloved. A choking cry filled her throat: My sun has set forever!
âCaucasus tradition, Nart Saga 26
Achilles removed the brilliant helmet from the lifeless Amazon queen. Penthesilea had fought like a raging leopard in their duel at Troy. Her valor and beauty were undimmed by dust and blood. Achillesâ heart lurched with remorse and desireâŠ. All the Greeks on the battlefield crowded around and marveled, wishing with all their hearts that their wives at home could be just like her.
âQuintus of Smyrna, The Fall of Troy
IF QUEEN AMEZAN AND QUEEN PENTHESILEA COULD somehow meet in real life, they would recognize each other as sister Amazons. Two tales, two storytellers, two sites far apart in time and place, and yet one common tradition of women who made love and war. The first tale arose outside the classical Greek world, in the northern Black SeaâCaucasus region among the descendants of the steppe nomads of Scythia. The other tale originated within the ancient Greek world, in epic poems about the legendary Trojan War. In the two traditions the male and female roles are reversed, yet the stories resonate in striking waysâsharing similar characters, dramatic battle situations, emotions, tragic themesâand even the word âAmazon.â
Recently translated from the Circassian language, the first story tells of the mythic leader of a band of women warriors, Amezan. It is one of many âNartâ sagas, oral traditions about heroes and heroines of the heart of ancient Scythianâand Amazonâterritory (now southern Russia). The Caucasus tales preserve ancient Indo-European myths combined with the folk legends of Eurasian nomads, first encountered by Greeks who sailed the Black Sea in the seventh century BC. The sagas not only describe strong horsewomen who match the descriptions of Amazons in Greek myth, but they also suggest a possible Caucasian etymology for the ancient Greek loanword âamazon.â1
The second vignette, about Achilles and Penthesilea, is an episode from the archaic Trojan War epic cycles, one of which was the Iliad. Many oral traditions about Amazons were already circulating before Homerâs day, the eighth/seventh century BC, around the time when the first recognizable images of Amazons appeared in Greek art. The Iliad covered only two months of the great ten-year war with Troy. At least six other epic poems preceded or continued the events in the Iliad, but they survive only as fragments. Many other lost oral traditions about the Trojan War are alluded to the Iliad and other works, and they are illustrated in ancient art depicting Greeks fighting Amazons. The lost poem Arimaspea by the Greek traveler Aristeas (ca. 670 BC) contained Amazon stories. Another wandering poet, Magnes from Smyrna (said to be Homerâs birthplace), recited tales in Lydian about an Amazon invasion of Lydia in western Anatolia in the early seventh century BC. Some scholars suggest that there was once a freestanding epic poem about Amazons, along the lines of the Iliad, a tantalizing possibility.2
One of the lost Trojan War epics, the Aethiopis (attributed to Arctinos of Miletos, eighth/seventh century BC), was a sequel to the Iliad, taking up the action where Homer left off. The Aethiopis described the arrival of Queen Penthesilea and her band of Amazon mercenaries who came to help the Trojans fight the Greeks. Scenes from this poem were very popular in Greek vase paintings. In the third century AD, the Greek poet Quintus of Smyrna drew on the Aethiopis to retell the story of Penthesileaâs duel with the Greek champion Achilles, in his Fall of Troy, quoted in this chapterâs second epigraph.
Both of the tales quoted aboveâone from Scythia and the other from the Greek homelandâfeature women whose fighting skills matched those of men. Their heroic exploits were imaginary, but their characters and actions arose from a common historical source: warrior cultures of the steppes where nomad horsemen and -women could experience parity at a level almost unimaginable for ancient Hellenes.
Myth and reality commingled in the Greek imagination, and as more and more details came to light about Scythian culture, the women of Scythia were explicitly identified as âAmazons.â Todayâs archaeological and linguistic discoveries point to the core of reality that lay behind Greek Amazon myths. But in fact, the newfound archaeological evidence allows us to finally catch up with the ancient Greeks themselves. The Amazons of myth and the independent women of Scythia were already deeply intertwined in Greek thinking more than twenty-five hundred years before modern archaeologists and classicists began to realize that women warriors really did exist and influenced Greek traditions.
Amazons of classical literature and art arose from hazy facts elaborated by Greek mythographers and then came into sharper focus as knowledge increased. Rumors of warlike nomad societiesâwhere a woman might win fame and glory through âmanlyâ prowess with weaponsâfascinated the Greeks. The idea of bold, resourceful women warriors, the equals of men, dwelling at the edges of the known world, inspired an outpouring of mythic stories, pitting the greatest Greek heroes against Amazon heroines from the East. Every Greek man, woman, boy, and girl knew these adventure stories by heart, stories illustrated in public and private artworks. The details of the âAmazonâ lifestyle aroused speculation and debate. Many classical Greco-Roman historians, philosophers, geographers, and other writers described Amazonian-Scythian history and customs.
The early Greeks received their information about northeastern peoples from many different sources, including travelers, traders, and explorers, and from the indigenous, migrating tribes around the Black Sea, Caucasus Mountains, Caspian Sea, and Central Asia. The tribesâ accounts of themselves and culturally similar groups were transmitted (and garbled) by layers of translations over thousands of miles. Another probable source was the high population of household slaves in Greece who hailed from Thrace and the Black Sea region.3 Selection bias was a factor. Accounts of âbarbarianâ customs that piqued Greek curiosity or matched Greek expectations might have been chosen over others. Yet a surprising number of accurate details, confirmed by archaeology, managed to sneak through all these obstacles.
The Scythians themselves left no written records. Much of our knowledge about them comes from the art and literature of Greece and Rome. But the Scythians did leave spectacular physical evidence of their way of life for archaeologists to uncover. Dramatic excavations of tombs, bodies, and artifacts illuminate the links between the women called Amazons and the warlike horsewomen archers of the Scythian steppes. According to one leading archaeologist, âAll of the legends about Amazons find their visible archaeological reflection within the grave goodsâ of the ancient Scythians.4 That is an overstatement, yet recent and ongoing discoveries do offer astonishing evidence of the existence of authentic women warriors whose lives matched the descriptions of Amazons in Greek myths, art, and classical histories, geographies, ethnographies, and other writings. Scythian graves do contain battle-scarred skeletons of women buried with their weapons, horses, and other possessions. Scientific bone analysis proves that women rode, hunted, and engaged in combat in the very regions where Greco-Roman mythographers and historians once located âAmazons.â
Archaeology shows that Amazons were not simply symbolic figments of the Greek imagination, as many scholars claim. Nor are Amazons unique to Greek culture, another common claim. In fact, Greeks were not the only people to spin tales about Amazon-like figures and warrior women ranging over the vast regions east of the Mediterranean. Other literate cultures, such as Persia, Egypt, India, and China, encountered warlike nomads in antiquity, and their narratives drew on their own knowledge of steppe nomads through alliances, exploration, trade, and warfare. Their heroes also fought and fell in love with Amazon-like heroines. Moreover, vestiges of the tales told in antiquity by Scythian peoples about themselves are preserved in traditional oral legends, epic poems, and stories of Central Asia, some only recently committed to writing.
Who were the Amazons? Their complex identity is enmeshed in history and imagination. To see them clearly, we first need to cast away murky symbolic interpretations and spurious popular beliefs.
POPULAR MISCONCEPTIONS
The single most notorious âfactâ often used to describe Amazons is wrong. The idea that each Amazon removed one breast so that she could shoot arrows with ease is based on zero evidence. It was refuted in antiquity. Yet this bizarre belief, unique to the ancient Greeks, has persisted for more than twenty-five hundred years since it was first proposed in the fifth century BC by a Greek historian dabbling in etymology. The origins of the âsingle-breastedâ Amazon and the controversies that still surround this false notion are so complex and fascinating that Amazon bosoms have their own chapter.
Some fallacies about Amazons can be traced to inconsistencies, gapsâand wild speculationsâin the ancient Greek and Latin sources. Other modern misconceptions originate in attempts to explain Amazons solely in terms of their symbolic meaning for the Greeks, especially male Athenians.5 Conflicting claims in antiquity are still debated today, like the single-breast story. Were the Amazons a true gynocracy, a society of self-governing women living apart from men? Some pictured a tribe of man-hating virgins or domineering women who enslaved weak men and mutilated baby boys, a vision that led to speculations on how Amazon society reproduced.
AMAZONS, A TRIBE KNOWN FOR STRONG WOMEN
The notion that Amazons were hostile toward men was controversial even in antiquity. The confusion begins with their name. Linguistic evidence suggests that the earliest Greek form of the non-Greek name Amazon designated an ethnic group distinguished by a high level of equality between men and women. Rumors of such parity would have startled the Greeks, who lived according to strictly divided male and female roles. Long before the word âScythianâ or specific tribal names appeared in Greek literature, âAmazonsâ may have been a name for a people notorious for strong, free women.6
The earliest reference to the Amazons in Greek literature appears in Homerâs Iliad in the formulaic phrase Amazones antianeirai. Modern scholars are unanimous that the plural noun Amazones was not originally a Greek word. But it is unclear which language it was borrowed from and what its original meaning was. What is known for certain is that Amazon does not have anything to do with breasts (chapter 5 for probable origins of the name).
There is something remarkable about Homerâs earliest use of Amazones in the Iliad. The form of the name falls into the linguistic category of ethnic designations in epic poetry (another Homeric example is Myrmidones, the warriors led by Achilles at Troy). This important clue tells us that Amazones was originally a Hellenized name for âa plurality, a people,â as in Hellenes for Greeks and Trooes for the Trojans. The Greeks used distinctive feminine endings (typically -ai) for associations made up exclusively of women, such as Nymphai (Nymphs) or Trooiai for Trojan women. But Amazones does not have the feminine ending that one would expect if the group consisted only of women. Therefore, the name Amazones would originally have been âunderstood as ⊠a people consisting of men and women.â As classicist Josine Blok points out in her discussion of this puzzle, without the addition of the feminine epithet antianeirai âthere is no way of telling that this was a people of female warriors.â7 The inescapable conclusion is that Amazones was not a name for a women-only entity, as many have assumed. Instead Amazones once indicated an entire ethnic group.
So the earliest literary references to Amazons identified them as a nation or people, followed by antianeirai, a descriptive tag along the lines of âthe Saka, Pointed Hat Wearers,â or âthe Budini, Eaters of Lice.â Indeed, many ancient Greek writers do treat Amazons as a tribe of men and women. They credit the tribe with innovations such as ironworking and domestication of horses. Some early vase paintings show men fighting alongside Amazons.8
But what about the meaning of the epithet attached to Amazones? That word is slippery and complex. Antianeirai is often translated in modern times as âopposites of men,â âagainst men,â âopposing men,â âantagonistic to men,â or âman-hating.â In fact, however, in ancient Greek epic diction the prefix anti- did not ordinarily suggest opposition or antagonism as the English prefix âanti-â does today. Instead anti- meant âequivalentâ or âmatching.â Accordingly, antianeirai is best translated as âequals of men.â
Such ethnonyms, names of tribes, are typically masculine, with the understanding that the female members are included in the collective name (as in âmanâ for all humans or âles Indiens dâAmĂ©riqueâ for an entire ethnic group). But the curious formation aneirai is a unique feminine plural compound that included the Greek masculine noun âman,â aner. A parallel formation occurs in the Amazon name Deianeira, âMan-Destroyer,â in which aner is the object of the verb stem dei (destroy) with the suffix -ia. If there had been a group of women named thus, the plural would...