Foodborne Illness and the Struggle for Food Safety
Timothy D. Lytton
This is a test
This is a test
Buch teilen
English
ePUB (handyfreundlich)
Ăber iOS und Android verfĂŒgbar
eBook - ePub
Outbreak
Foodborne Illness and the Struggle for Food Safety
Timothy D. Lytton
Angaben zum Buch
Buchvorschau
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Quellenangaben
Ăber dieses Buch
Foodborne illness is a big problem. Wash those chicken breasts, and you're likely to spread Salmonella to your countertops, kitchen towels, and other foods nearby. Even salad greens can become biohazards when toxic strains of E. coli inhabit the water used to irrigate crops. All told, contaminated food causes 48 million illnesses, 128, 000 hospitalizations, and 3, 000 deaths each year in the United States.With Outbreak, Timothy D. Lytton provides an up-to-date history and analysis of the US food safety system. He pays particular attention to important but frequently overlooked elements of the system, including private audits and liability insurance.Lytton chronicles efforts dating back to the 1800s to combat widespread contamination by pathogens such as E. coli and salmonella that have become frighteningly familiar to consumers. Over time, deadly foodborne illness outbreaks caused by infected milk, poison hamburgers, and tainted spinach have spurred steady scientific and technological advances in food safety. Nevertheless, problems persist. Inadequate agency budgets restrict the reach of government regulation. Pressure from consumers to keep prices down constrains industry investments in safety. The limits of scientific knowledge leave experts unable to assess policies' effectiveness and whether measures designed to reduce contamination have actually improved public health. Outbreak offers practical reforms that will strengthen the food safety system's capacity to learn from its mistakes and identify cost-effective food safety efforts capable of producing measurable public health benefits.
HĂ€ufig gestellte Fragen
Wie kann ich mein Abo kĂŒndigen?
Gehe einfach zum Kontobereich in den Einstellungen und klicke auf âAbo kĂŒndigenâ â ganz einfach. Nachdem du gekĂŒndigt hast, bleibt deine Mitgliedschaft fĂŒr den verbleibenden Abozeitraum, den du bereits bezahlt hast, aktiv. Mehr Informationen hier.
(Wie) Kann ich BĂŒcher herunterladen?
Derzeit stehen all unsere auf MobilgerĂ€te reagierenden ePub-BĂŒcher zum Download ĂŒber die App zur VerfĂŒgung. Die meisten unserer PDFs stehen ebenfalls zum Download bereit; wir arbeiten daran, auch die ĂŒbrigen PDFs zum Download anzubieten, bei denen dies aktuell noch nicht möglich ist. Weitere Informationen hier.
Welcher Unterschied besteht bei den Preisen zwischen den AboplÀnen?
Mit beiden AboplÀnen erhÀltst du vollen Zugang zur Bibliothek und allen Funktionen von Perlego. Die einzigen Unterschiede bestehen im Preis und dem Abozeitraum: Mit dem Jahresabo sparst du auf 12 Monate gerechnet im Vergleich zum Monatsabo rund 30 %.
Was ist Perlego?
Wir sind ein Online-Abodienst fĂŒr LehrbĂŒcher, bei dem du fĂŒr weniger als den Preis eines einzelnen Buches pro Monat Zugang zu einer ganzen Online-Bibliothek erhĂ€ltst. Mit ĂŒber 1 Million BĂŒchern zu ĂŒber 1.000 verschiedenen Themen haben wir bestimmt alles, was du brauchst! Weitere Informationen hier.
UnterstĂŒtzt Perlego Text-zu-Sprache?
Achte auf das Symbol zum Vorlesen in deinem nÀchsten Buch, um zu sehen, ob du es dir auch anhören kannst. Bei diesem Tool wird dir Text laut vorgelesen, wobei der Text beim Vorlesen auch grafisch hervorgehoben wird. Du kannst das Vorlesen jederzeit anhalten, beschleunigen und verlangsamen. Weitere Informationen hier.
Ist Outbreak als Online-PDF/ePub verfĂŒgbar?
Ja, du hast Zugang zu Outbreak von Timothy D. Lytton im PDF- und/oder ePub-Format sowie zu anderen beliebten BĂŒchern aus Diritto & Teoria e pratica del diritto. Aus unserem Katalog stehen dir ĂŒber 1Â Million BĂŒcher zur VerfĂŒgung.
The family farms of Rocky Ford, Colorado, enjoy a well-deserved reputation for producing exceptionally flavorful cantaloupes. The surrounding Arkansas River Valley offers ideal conditions for melon cultivationâhot days and cool nights that enhance the plantsâ sugar production. But in 2011, cantaloupes from this region attracted attention for a different reason. They were the source of one of the deadliest food poisoning outbreaks in US history.
Eric and Ryan Jensen, two hardworking brothers in their mid-thirties, raised and packed cantaloupes ninety miles east of Rocky Ford. Fourth-generation melon farmers, the brothers inherited 160 acres from their father and expanded their operations to 6,000 acres. During the 2011 harvest, Jensen Farms produced three hundred thousand cases of cantaloupes, labeled âSweet Rocky Fords,â which were sold through a distributor to leading retail supermarkets, such as Walmart, Kroger, and Safeway. Many of these melons were contaminated with a virulent bacterial pathogen, Listeria monocytogenes, and they caused 147 reported cases of serious illness and thirty-three deaths in twenty-eight states.1
No one has ever conclusively identified the source of the contamination. One possibility is organic fertilizer. At the time of the outbreak, the brothers were in the midst of a three-year process of converting their operations from conventional to organic production, which requires replacing mineral fertilizers and chemical pesticides with alternatives derived from plants and animals. From a business perspective, the brothers sought to profit from the growing consumer demand for organic fruits and vegetables. They also had a deeply personal reason for the shift. Their father, Robert Jensen, had died in March 2010, at the age of fifty-nine, from cancer, which the brothers suspected might have been caused by pesticide or other chemical exposure. They believed that organic production would redeem Jensen Farms from decades of synthetic fertilizer and pesticide application. However, organic fertilizers also pose risks to human health. If not properly treated, they can harbor microorganisms, including bacterial pathogens such as Salmonella, E. coli, and Listeria.2
The Jensen brothers were not unmindful of the risk of bacterial contamination. They began post-harvest processing by immersing the melons in a dunk tank filled with chlorinated water to remove dirt and reduce harmful bacteria on the surface of the fruit. The melons were then dried, packed into crates, placed in cold storage, and later shipped to a distributor for sale to retail stores. In August 2010, a private food safety auditor inspected the fields and packinghouse operations, awarding Jensen Farms a score of 95 percent and a âsuperiorâ rating. When one of the brothers asked how they could improve their processing, the auditor responded that the dunk tank, with its recirculating water, was a potential food safety âhot spotâ and that they should consider replacing it.3
The following spring, with advice from a local equipment supplier, the brothers purchased and installed spray-washing equipment originally designed to clean potatoes and modified for melon processing. The new equipment used non-recirculating city water to wash the melons as they passed along a conveyer belt. A subsequent July 2011 audit awarded Jensen Farms a score of 96 percent and another âsuperiorâ rating. The audit report noted that the spray wash system âdoes not have anti-microbial solution injected,â but this was not characterized as a deficiency, nor did it detract from the audit score. To the Jensens, the new non-recirculating spray wash system appeared more sanitary than the old dunk tank, which became increasingly dirty during the course of each production run. However, without antimicrobial solution added to the wash water, the spray wash spread bacterial contamination from melon to melon and dispersed it all over the processing equipment.4
By late August, Colorado health officials began receiving reports of individuals suffering from listeriosis. On September 2, they notified the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of seven cases in the state. Within a week, state and federal investigators traced the source of the outbreak to Jensen Farms cantaloupe. Four investigators arrived at the farm on September 9 and 10 to collect samples. Tests confirmed that samples taken from Jensen Farms melons, equipment, and facilities contained the same pathogenic strains of Listeria as those found in recently reported cases of listeriosis. The Jensens immediately ceased shipment of their cantaloupes and destroyed their remaining crops, and on September 14, the company voluntarily ordered a seventeen-state recall of its melons.5
The recall came too late for forty-eight-year-old Shelly Occhipinti-Krout, who left behind a husband and three children when she died from listeriosis, which she contracted from eating Jensen Farms cantaloupe. âIt started with just flu-like symptoms,â her daughter Tiffany recalls. âThen she collapsed . . . and was taken to the hospital. While she was getting a CAT scan, she went into cardiac arrest, and doctors put her into a medically induced coma.â After three weeks in the hospital, her body was so swollen from the infection that she was unrecognizable. âI kept thinking that she was going to come home,â says Tiffany. âShe went like a normal person to the grocery store, got her stuff, came home, and ate it. From that my mom got sick, and Iâm never going to see her again.â6
Eighty-seven-year-old William Beach also died of listeriosis from eating Jensen Farms cantaloupe. âHe was in and out of the hospital several times,â remembers his wife, Monette. âAbout a month before he died, we were in the living room watching TV one night, and he said, âHoney, weâve got trouble; there is something wrong with me, and I donât know what it is.ââ In the hospital, when doctors attempted to insert a feeding and medication tube, he began to hemorrhage through his mouth and nose. William eventually succumbed to the infection. âThe bottom line here is that my father died because somebody didnât do their job,â says Williamâs daughter Debbie, expressing a view held by many victims and their families. âI think itâs unconscionable. All of us hope that when we go itâs quick. But never, ever, do we ever think that itâs going to come with us spewing blood out of our mouth and our nose in terror because we donât know whatâs going on but we know itâs over. Somebodyâs responsible for it.â7
In the end, public health authorities attributed 147 reported cases of listeriosis to tainted cantaloupes from Jensen Farms. Thirty-three victims died within weeks of consuming the melon, and another ten died months later, possibly as a result of the infection. Some of those who survived sustained brain injuries and other long-term disabilities. Victims and their families were left with large medical billsâin several cases exceeding a million dollars.8
Researchers at the CDC in Atlanta estimate that â48 million people get sick, 128,000 are hospitalized, and 3,000 die from foodborne diseases each year in the United States.â (For a detailed account of how researchers estimate the number of cases and the economic costs of foodborne illness, see appendix A.) These statistics have led many commentators to declare the food safety system âbrokenâ and in need of significant reform. A report by the US Public Interest Research Group analyzing outbreaks and recalls in 2011 and 2012 concludes that foodborne illness caused by microbial contamination âhas stayed stagnant and potentially grown worse, taking a substantial toll on public health and the economy,â and that âthe rules and inspection systems we have now are not up to the task.â9
Not everyone agrees that outbreaks signify that the system is broken. Even highly effective regulatory programs tolerate a certain amount of risk. There will always be some residual risk in the food systemâzero risk is simply not possible. As one food safety professional with more than thirty years of experience in the poultry sector puts it: âPeople who demand bacteria-free eggs just donât understand where they come fromâthereâs only one way out of the chicken.â Nor is zero risk a desirable goal, because at a certain point, the costs of additional risk reduction would outweigh the benefits. Tom Vilsack, secretary of agriculture in the Obama administration, expressed a view widely shared within the food industry when he boasted in 2012 that, although there is admittedly room for improvement, the United States has the worldâs âsafest food supplyâan achievement made possible by a wide range of skilled, dedicated people.â10
Leaving aside for the moment the question of how well the food safety system performs, available data suggest that foodborne illness in the United States is a problem of noteworthy magnitude comparable to other common sources of illness and injury that have attracted the attention of public health authorities. (The analysis that follows relies on data drawn from a variety of sources, collected using various methods, and covering different years. Some of the numbers represent direct tallies from health records, while others are estimates that rely on surveys and statistical models. The aim is to provide general perspective not precise comparisons.) By using the CDC estimate, figure 1.1 shows that annual deaths from foodborne illness are far fewer in number than those caused by tobacco smoking, obesity, and alcohol use; considerably fewer than those caused by poisoning, motor vehicles, and falls; comparable to those caused by drowning, fire, and natural disasters; and significantly greater than those caused by machinery, firearms, cycling, and cutting and piercing.
Figure 1.2 compares the estimated number of hospitalizations from foodborne illness to those from leading sources of injury.11 Although hospitalizations from foodborne illness are fewer than those of the top three sources of nonfatal injuryâfalls, poisoning, and motor vehicle accidentsâthey exceed several other leading sources, such as burns, cutting and piercing, natural disasters, firearms, cycling, machinery, and drowning.
Figure 1.3 suggests that the estimated number of foodborne illness episodes involving acute illness far exceeds that of other leading forms of unintentional injury.12
Using estimates from researchers at the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Economic Research Service, figure 1.4 compares the cost of medical care due to foodborne illness and leading forms of illness and unintentional injury. The medical costs of foodborne illness rank below those of tobacco smoking, obesity, falls, cycling, alcohol use, motor vehicle accidents, and poisoning, but they exceed those of burns, drowning, and firearms.
The burden of foodborne illness falls most heavily on the elderly, who are at greatest risk of death or severe complications. Half of the reported listeriosis cases in the Jensen Farms melon outbreak were among individuals older than seventy-seven years, and most who died were older than eighty. In a 2011 report on foodborne illness caused by major pathogens, the CDC found that 13 percent of infections, 24 percent of hospitalizations, and 57 percent of deaths occurred among adults sixty-five or older. Thus, the elderly not only face a higher risk of infection; they are also far more likely to suffer serious illness and death as a result. Young children and those who are immunosuppressedâfor example, cancer patients receiving chemotherapyâalso face a higher risk.13