eBook - ePub
Language and Neurology
Alzheimer's Disease
Christophe Cusimano
This is a test
Buch teilen
- English
- ePUB (handyfreundlich)
- Ăber iOS und Android verfĂŒgbar
eBook - ePub
Language and Neurology
Alzheimer's Disease
Christophe Cusimano
Angaben zum Buch
Buchvorschau
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Quellenangaben
Ăber dieses Buch
This book questions the relationship and compatibility between current beliefs in neurology and contemporary textual linguistic theories, interpretative semantics and discourse analysis.
It begins with a critical examination of the screenings for Alzheimers type dementia through cognitive testing, particularly screenings where language is used. It then analyzes the various linguistic properties (morphological, syntactic and semantic) of the speech of Alzheimers patients, which can be troubling for both caregivers and their environment in general.
More than a synthesis of critical linguistic reflections, Language and Neurology provokes a fruitful reflection through adjustments suggested by the acquired knowledge of textual semantics.
HĂ€ufig gestellte Fragen
Wie kann ich mein Abo kĂŒndigen?
Gehe einfach zum Kontobereich in den Einstellungen und klicke auf âAbo kĂŒndigenâ â ganz einfach. Nachdem du gekĂŒndigt hast, bleibt deine Mitgliedschaft fĂŒr den verbleibenden Abozeitraum, den du bereits bezahlt hast, aktiv. Mehr Informationen hier.
(Wie) Kann ich BĂŒcher herunterladen?
Derzeit stehen all unsere auf MobilgerĂ€te reagierenden ePub-BĂŒcher zum Download ĂŒber die App zur VerfĂŒgung. Die meisten unserer PDFs stehen ebenfalls zum Download bereit; wir arbeiten daran, auch die ĂŒbrigen PDFs zum Download anzubieten, bei denen dies aktuell noch nicht möglich ist. Weitere Informationen hier.
Welcher Unterschied besteht bei den Preisen zwischen den AboplÀnen?
Mit beiden AboplÀnen erhÀltst du vollen Zugang zur Bibliothek und allen Funktionen von Perlego. Die einzigen Unterschiede bestehen im Preis und dem Abozeitraum: Mit dem Jahresabo sparst du auf 12 Monate gerechnet im Vergleich zum Monatsabo rund 30 %.
Was ist Perlego?
Wir sind ein Online-Abodienst fĂŒr LehrbĂŒcher, bei dem du fĂŒr weniger als den Preis eines einzelnen Buches pro Monat Zugang zu einer ganzen Online-Bibliothek erhĂ€ltst. Mit ĂŒber 1 Million BĂŒchern zu ĂŒber 1.000 verschiedenen Themen haben wir bestimmt alles, was du brauchst! Weitere Informationen hier.
UnterstĂŒtzt Perlego Text-zu-Sprache?
Achte auf das Symbol zum Vorlesen in deinem nÀchsten Buch, um zu sehen, ob du es dir auch anhören kannst. Bei diesem Tool wird dir Text laut vorgelesen, wobei der Text beim Vorlesen auch grafisch hervorgehoben wird. Du kannst das Vorlesen jederzeit anhalten, beschleunigen und verlangsamen. Weitere Informationen hier.
Ist Language and Neurology als Online-PDF/ePub verfĂŒgbar?
Ja, du hast Zugang zu Language and Neurology von Christophe Cusimano im PDF- und/oder ePub-Format sowie zu anderen beliebten BĂŒchern aus Psicologia & Scienze cognitive. Aus unserem Katalog stehen dir ĂŒber 1Â Million BĂŒcher zur VerfĂŒgung.
Information
1
Linguistics, Language Pathologies and Alzheimerâs Disease: A Brief History
As we noted in the introduction, very few linguists have studied language pathologies in a medical context; the development of specialized linguistic theories with practical applications in this area has seemingly been perceived as overly challenging. This does not mean that theories developed in unrelated contexts â for example, in our own field of interpretative semantics or speech analysis â may not be used to cast light on these issues; however, it reinforces the general perception of a persistent lack of research in this area.
It is thus the history of the domain itself, and not simply our summary of this history, which is âbriefâ. The lack of interest in this area on the part of linguists has left the field wide open for a series of postulates, mostly derived from the field of neuroscience, to take root; we shall discuss these postulates in greater detail later.
For the moment, we shall focus our discussion on the theory of mediation, the only linguistic theory focusing on language pathologies; we shall then turn our attention to other theories which have been used in attempting to describe or explain these pathologies.
1.1. Gagnepainâs theory of mediation: an approach to pathological speech on its own terms
Few linguistic theories have addressed the issue of language disorders. One of the most incendiary and original theories in this select group is Jean Gagnepainâs theory of mediation. This theory is, inexplicably, not well known among linguists; however, its wide applicability has inspired many researchers and supporters from across the field of social sciences. The theory has its roots in a meeting between Gagnepain and Sabouraud, a neuropsychiatrist, following the formerâs installation as professor of âpureâ linguistics at Rennes in 1956. At this early date, there was nothing to suggest that Gagnepain â whose thesis concerned Celtic syntactics â would direct his attentions to pathologies. This change in direction was to his advantage: the author is not particularly well known for his earlier work1, but for his proposed âdeconstructionâ of language, which reverses the usual logic whereby we define a norm, then describe deviations from this norm. On the contrary, Gagnepain and Sabouraud considered language pathologies as a type of reagent, revealing the true, underlying mechanisms of language; each pathology highlights, in some way, processes which are not visible when everything is functioning âcorrectlyâ (Gagnepain 2006, p. 54)2:
âWe consider the mental patient as a teacher of linguistics: he or she teaches us how language works. Insofar as its operation is not haphazard, we attempt, from the patientâs behavior, to induce the grammatical rules which govern the construction of their messagesâ3.
Before going into detail concerning this theory and its main contributions, it is interesting to note that the dominance of structuralism in recent decades has resulted in the marginalization of certain âfringeâ theories in spite of their clear structuralist slant, such as TesniĂšreâs structural syntax. The same can be said of the theory of mediation, situated by its authors along these lines (TesniĂšre 1963, p. 86), as we clearly see from the conclusion to their remarkable study of aphasia:
âUsing structural linguistics, we have attempted to define the principal illustrations provided by the study of aphasic patientsâ.
The theory of mediation (TDM, from the French thĂ©orie de la mĂ©diation) posits that human beings exercise a form of âmediationâ in their relations with the world. Gagnepain defines this as âthe intrusion, into the immediate of an element which cannot be immediately understood, of a mediate, whether in the structure, in praxis, or on an implicit levelâ (Gagnepain 2016, p. 31). In this quotation, we see that the author refuses to assimilate reason to language alone; we also detect the âessenceâ of the TDM itself, in the division of human capacities into a series of planes, or levels. The TDM is systematically referred to as a theory of deconstruction, by Gagnepain himself and by subsequent commentators. This deconstruction is rendered necessary by the number and variety of disorders observed in patients, and operates on four different planes, not just the capacity of speech; Gagnepain sweepingly asserted that all previous authors â including Saussure â had limited their reflection to this more simplistic approach:
âWe have made a clear break with those who have gone before us in refusing to reduce rationality to a single mode. While most thinkers have restricted reason to its verbal form alone, following the Greek tradition of the logos, we have established four rational modesâ.
According to Gagnepain, these four planes are not a priori objects, but rather products, based on observations. Working closely with Sabouraud, Gagnepain gained access to a large group of aphasic patients (the subjects of the authorsâ earliest analyses), along with dyslexic, dysgraphic, dyspraxic and even schizophrenic patients, straddling the line between neurology and psychiatry with ease. This approach to pathologies as a whole is the reason TDM is also referred to as a âclinical anthropologyâ.
The difficulties and inabilities of each type of patient highlight different capacities. MjachkĂœ (2016, p. 29), author of a thesis on determinants which was based, in part, on the theory of mediation, calls attention to both the independence of planes (enabling understanding of phenomena) and the unity resulting from their presence, to a greater or lesser extent, in all subjects:
âThese modalities, which Gagnepain refers to as âplanesâ, are âlanguageâ, the aforementioned faculty of representation; the âtoolâ, which is the faculty of fabrication; the âpersonâ, which is the faculty of the social being; and the ânormâ, which is the faculty of ethical analysis. The value of this model lies, amongst other aspects, in the fact that each of these autonomous rationales is viewed analogically, i.e. that man, whilst a pluridimensional being â deconstructed, in a certain way â remains one, precisely in light of the identity of construction of each dimension (plane)â.
The four planes identified by Gagnepain and Sabouraud, in their own terms, are: language (plane I, giving rise to the science in question here, glossology); tools (plane II, the subject of ergology); the person (plane III: sociology, and to some extent politics and even legislation) and norms (plane IV, relating to ethics). In this case, Gagnepain showed a rare degree of humility in noting that, as these four planes were identified through observations, his list was not necessarily exhaustive.
Just as the TDM is broken down into four planes, glossology itself can be broken down, in the context of pathology studies, into four levels. These do not correspond in any way to the conventional division of domains within the language sciences; Gagnepainâs aim was for these four levels to correspond, analogically, to the four higher levels. In this sense, the term âsub-levelsâ is not entirely appropriate, as we shall see. This difficulty is clearly explained by Jean-Quentel and Beaud (2006, p. 39):
âWe have thus âdeconstructedâ language into four registers which correspond to the four planes of the theory of mediation: grammaticality, writing, word usage and speech. Only one of these four registers, grammaticality, specifically concerns language. The other three registers result from the action of external processes of a different order on language. Writing is, at the end of the day, a technical matter; word usage relates to a social dimension, and speech involves an ethical processâ.
The analogy between the divisions at the higher level and those identified within the language register is remarkably original, practical and, according to the author, applicable to a range of pathologies. This double deconstruction is summarized in the diagram below (according to our interpretation: neither Gagnepain nor any of his followers have used this representation).
Quentel and Beaudâs illustration of language deconstruction does not specifically touch on pathologies, but is centered on a convincing discussion of language acquisition in children. In a succinct discussion, the authors present at least one disorder associated with each dimension. Quentel and Beaud present dysphasia as a disorder relating to grammaticality, and dyslexia as a disorder relating to reading. Disorders connected with word usage are harder to identify clearly, corresponding to infantile psychoses which act on the childâs capacity to interact with others but do not affect grammaticality. Finally, communication disorders, or the lack of desire to communicate, relate to the speech register.
Gagnepain and Sabouraud began by testing their hypotheses in the context of aphasia, notably confirming, in practice, Saussureâs theory of the biaxiality between paradigm and syntagm. Patients with Wernicke-type aphasia were shown to be unable to complete identification, recognition or choice tasks on both the signifier and signified levels. Patients suffering from Brocaâs aphasia were unable to segment speech chains in any appropriate way (neither phonemes nor lexical units). Once again, this disorder concerns both the signifier and signified levels. However, Wernicke-type aphasia clearly involves a disorder on the paradigmatic operation level (or the âtaxonomicâ level, according to Gagnepain 2016, p. 61): âPatients with Wernickeâs aphasia have lost the capacity to choose, but retain the ability to segment text; everything in their lexicon is confusedâ. Broca-type aphasia patients cannot carry out syntagm segmentation (Gagnepainâs âgenerativeâ level, 2016, p. 62): âPatients with Brocaâs aphasia, who are unable to combine and who cannot add one and one, tend to make more precise choicesâ. These examples both concern language production, but these disorders may also be observed in language reception.
As we have just seen, aphasia sufferers may be grouped according to their relation to biaxiality; they may also be categorized according to the signifier/signified duality: âone finding of aphasiology concerns the âbreaking upâ of signs: some patients possess the capacity for phonological analysis alone, without semiological analysis, or vice-versaâ (Gagnepain 2016, pp. 55â56). The author refers to phonological Wernickeâs or Brocaâs aphasia when the capacity for phonological analysis is deficient, and to semiological Wernickeâs or Brocaâs aphasia when the capacity for semiological analysis is lacking. In this way, Gagnepain defines four different types. We shall not go into any detail concerning Gagnepainâs studies of aphasia here; interested readers may wish to consult the works cited in the bibliography.
Gagnepain only briefly touches on Alzheimerâs disease, perhaps due to a lack of personal interest, or to the period in which he was working (1970sâ1990s), when the contours of the disease were only just becoming clear. He mentioned the disease only in the context of a discussion of the way in which society regards the elderly. In his sixth âlessonâ, Devenir ce que nous sommes (Becoming What We Are), the author considers elder care homes, offering up a reflection in which he questions the practice of placing seniors in these establishments, noting that the idea of the â...