eBook - ePub
Mourning and Mysticism in First World War Literature and Beyond
Grappling with Ghosts
George M. Johnson
This is a test
Partager le livre
- English
- ePUB (adapté aux mobiles)
- Disponible sur iOS et Android
eBook - ePub
Mourning and Mysticism in First World War Literature and Beyond
Grappling with Ghosts
George M. Johnson
DĂ©tails du livre
Aperçu du livre
Table des matiĂšres
Citations
Ă propos de ce livre
This book traces how iconic writers - including Arthur Conan Doyle, J.M. Barrie, Rudyard Kipling, Virginia Woolf, Wilfred Owen, and Aldous Huxley - shaped their response to the loss of loved ones in the First World War through their embrace of mysticism.
Foire aux questions
Comment puis-je résilier mon abonnement ?
Il vous suffit de vous rendre dans la section compte dans paramĂštres et de cliquer sur « RĂ©silier lâabonnement ». Câest aussi simple que cela ! Une fois que vous aurez rĂ©siliĂ© votre abonnement, il restera actif pour le reste de la pĂ©riode pour laquelle vous avez payĂ©. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Puis-je / comment puis-je télécharger des livres ?
Pour le moment, tous nos livres en format ePub adaptĂ©s aux mobiles peuvent ĂȘtre tĂ©lĂ©chargĂ©s via lâapplication. La plupart de nos PDF sont Ă©galement disponibles en tĂ©lĂ©chargement et les autres seront tĂ©lĂ©chargeables trĂšs prochainement. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Quelle est la différence entre les formules tarifaires ?
Les deux abonnements vous donnent un accĂšs complet Ă la bibliothĂšque et Ă toutes les fonctionnalitĂ©s de Perlego. Les seules diffĂ©rences sont les tarifs ainsi que la pĂ©riode dâabonnement : avec lâabonnement annuel, vous Ă©conomiserez environ 30 % par rapport Ă 12 mois dâabonnement mensuel.
Quâest-ce que Perlego ?
Nous sommes un service dâabonnement Ă des ouvrages universitaires en ligne, oĂč vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă toute une bibliothĂšque pour un prix infĂ©rieur Ă celui dâun seul livre par mois. Avec plus dâun million de livres sur plus de 1 000 sujets, nous avons ce quâil vous faut ! DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Prenez-vous en charge la synthÚse vocale ?
Recherchez le symbole Ăcouter sur votre prochain livre pour voir si vous pouvez lâĂ©couter. Lâoutil Ăcouter lit le texte Ă haute voix pour vous, en surlignant le passage qui est en cours de lecture. Vous pouvez le mettre sur pause, lâaccĂ©lĂ©rer ou le ralentir. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Est-ce que Mourning and Mysticism in First World War Literature and Beyond est un PDF/ePUB en ligne ?
Oui, vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă Mourning and Mysticism in First World War Literature and Beyond par George M. Johnson en format PDF et/ou ePUB ainsi quâĂ dâautres livres populaires dans Storia et Storia militare e marittima. Nous disposons de plus dâun million dâouvrages Ă dĂ©couvrir dans notre catalogue.
Informations
Sujet
StoriaSous-sujet
Storia militare e marittima1
F. W. H. Myers: Loss and the Obsessive Study of Survival
âI know no man who seems to have lived more consistently in a sort of rapture of thought, without weary or discontented interludes, but in an impassioned ecstasy of sweetness. In this he was a mystic, and his joyful serenity of mind is just what one finds in the lives of mystics.â
A. C. Benson âFrederic Myersâ 183
âThe reader need not suppose that I expect his admiration. But if he on his part be psychologically minded, he will prefer that idiosyncrasy should not be concealed. If he is to be interested at all, it must be in the spectacle of a man of sensuous and emotional temperament, urged and driven by his own personal passion into undertaking a scientific enterprise, which aims at the common weal of men ⊠what has been accomplished did in fact demand, â among many nobler qualities contributed by better men, â that importunate and overmastering impulse which none can more fiercely feel than I.â
Frederic Myers, introduction to âFragments of Inner Lifeâ 2
The young boy sits on a wooden chair in a sparsely furnished rectory, his mother presiding over him. The boy looks up, bible in hand, and asks his mummy whether bad people go straight to hell. His mother purses her lips and looks away before telling him that evil people might be destroyed at death. His lip quivers as he asks whether they would have the same fate as the mole he had seen crushed by a cartwheel, and she reluctantly says perhaps. Tears well up and he staggers to his feet, as if reeling from shock. His motherâs forehead creases, but before she can respond he has darted out the French window to the garden. She calls out Freddie, but he takes no notice, instead running to his favorite spot, under a great clump and tangle of blush roses. There he sobs, and through his tears looks down on the black pool of Bassenthwaite Lake and then up towards Skiddaw mountain, its shoulders and peak cloaked by cloud. He becomes entranced by the cloudsâ movements until the peak emerges, as high as heaven, and his tears subside.
Some days later, his mother gently pushes him forward into the sickroom, where the pale and shrunken figure of his father lies, barely recognizable from just a few months before. Then, his father had paced in the study, declaiming Virgil and emphasizing the stresses with his hand. Freddie flushes, remembering how his father had scolded him for not having done his exercises as well as he might have, and he wonders whether this neglect has helped bring on his fatherâs sudden illness. Freddie sits beside his mother, holding her hand, as she with her other hand holds her husbandâs until it grows cold, and the breath ceases. His mother tries to control her crying, and Freddie places a kiss on her cheek. In the days that follow, he appears at just the right moments, when his mother is borne down by her tragedy, head in her hands, and he caresses her or reads from a little book of Christian Meditations. One time, when overpowered with grief, she murmurs âthere can never be joy again.â Freddie says earnestly, âYou know, God can do everything, and He might give us, just once, such a vision of him as should make us happy all our lives after.â
Young Freddie grew up to be Frederic W. H. Myers (Illustration 1.1), and the scenes I have reconstructed here capture something of the most critical moments of his early childhood. Myers recounts that he felt âthe first horror of a death without resurrectionâ when he saw a dead mole before age six, and how his âbrain reeled under the shockâ of being told by his mother that a soul might be annihilated. In a journal, his mother recounted his sensitivity to the death of an unnamed baby cousin and to another called Harry. She also noted how much of a comfort he was to her in her âdeep sorrowâ after the loss of her husband (Gauld 43). Those losses, particularly of Myersâs father, which also entailed the loss of his beloved early environment, combined with his motherâs emotional overinvestment in her eldest son, provide the sources for his obsessional quest to prove the survival of personality beyond death. Myers possessed âa sensuous and emotional temperament,â as he himself realized, and he learned early on to channel some of this emotion into poetry, increasingly so after he experienced the greatest loss of his adult life, the suicide of his cousin Annie Marshall, for whom he had developed an intense platonic love. From this point on, his response to loss was increasingly avoidant-resistant, as his unresolved mourning and preoccupation with death was directed into his gargantuan labors at psychical research and the dynamic psychology that he constructed. To observers, such as A. C. Benson quoted in the epigraph, he could appear to be âa mystic,â living âconsistently in a sort of rapture of thoughtâ (183), but his wife, Eveleen was less than thrilled with this detachment.
From the 1880s Myers developed his theory of the subliminal self, with its emphasis on the limitless potential of the psyche, and he also probed many other psychical phenomena, including telepathy, automatic writing, and crisis apparitions, through publications of the Society for Psychical Research, which he helped found in 1882, but also in respected literary publications. Myers, aided by his socially ambitious wife, became the nexus for the fascination with psychical phenomena in the later Victorian period. He was well connected not only with the literati, but also with the philosophers, scientists, and mental scientists intrigued by this pursuit. Although Myers died of a respiratory ailment at a relatively early age, his magnum opus, Human Personality and its Survival of Bodily Death, published posthumously in 1903, collected hundreds of cases demonstrating extensions of personality into the realm of spirit, thus supporting his survival of personality thesis. Partly because of its controversial nature, this work was hugely influential to the point where one historian, John Cerullo, has referred to the period from 1903 to the 1920s as âthe Age of Myersâ in psychical research (103). Myersâs work acted as a bridge to the next generation of writers, the Edwardians and emerging modernists, and interest in it surged during and after the war as society attempted to cope with the mass trauma of war loss. Following Myersâs lead to one degree or another, writers such as Barrie, Doyle, Kipling, Sinclair, Woolf, Blackwood, and Huxley in this study, and many more besides, considered various extensions of consciousness within a construct of realism, as no longer belonging to the realm of gothic fantasy, and articulated the real possibility of telepathic or spirit communication between the living and between the living and the dead. Interestingly, Myersâs voice persisted beyond death as well, since it was purportedly channeled by an astonishing array of mediums; Myers thus had a further impact on mystical responses to loss of writers such as Sir Oliver Lodge, as detailed in Chapter 3.
In his autobiographical âFragments of Inner Life,â Myers invites scrutiny, suggesting that readers âwill prefer that [his] idiosyncrasy should not be concealedâ (2). However, just before this he states:
I hold that all things thought and felt, as well as all things done, are somehow photographed imperishably upon the universe, and that my whole past will probably lie open to those with whom I have to do. Repugnant though this thought is to me, I am bound to face it. I realize that a too great discrepancy between my account of myself and the actual facts would, when detected, provoke disgust and contempt.
This statement implies an anxiety about exposure, a repugnance to it, but also a fear of discrepancy, or hypocrisy. What underlies this anxiety? Did Myers have secrets? What is the nature of his self-proclaimed idiosyncrasy? A careful examination of biographical details and the patterns that emerge, through the lens of object relations and attachment theory, can reveal new insights. In the first full-length biography of Myers, Trevor Hamilton counters an earlier biographer Fraser Nicholsâs speculation that the seeds of Myersâs future troubles at Cambridge âwere unwittingly planted by the love of a too-doting mother for her brilliant childâ (12). Hamilton asserts:
in the light of other comments on the character of Mrs Myers, this is probably a superficial Freudian speculation. Myers grew up in a very supportive environment, had considerable natural gifts, a strong physique, and optimistic temperament, and huge energy. (12)
Myersâs environment may have been supportive up to a point, but it also was exceptional, even for the Victorian period. Myersâs father, also Frederic, born in 1811, excelled academically. He became a scholar at Clare College, Cambridge, where he received scholarships and âthe Hulsean essay prize in 1830,â later becoming a fellow there (Hamilton 10). Myers took religious orders, and in 1838 became the perpetual curate of St Johnâs, Keswick. He married at 28, but his wife Fanny died the next year. He then married Freddieâs mother Susan two years later, and so loss and grief would have been embedded in the relationship from its beginning. Whereas he was tolerant, liberal in his religious views, and committed to educating his parishioners, his wife was much more of an evangelical. Both were ambitious, particularly in regards to Freddie. At a very early age Frederic senior taught Freddie the classics, inspiring him with a love of Virgil (10).
Susan concerned herself with Freddieâs religious education, emphasizing a literalist understanding of the Bible as well as self-improvement in preparation for the afterlife (Hamilton 12). This education she began when Freddie was just two years and nine months old, and she had him reading the Bible at just over four (Gauld 38). In the journal she kept from the time Freddie was one year and six days old until two months after her husband died when Freddie was eight, she recorded his responses to her teaching, such as his shock and grief âwhen good men do anything wrong,â or his âburst of tearsâ when she told him that the dead mole had no soul and so would not go to heaven (Gauld 39). She soon realized that he possessed a sensitive nature: âand along with this delight is a proportionate pain when he is disappointed in anything he has set his heart upon â or when his will is crossed, or his fancy, in anythingâ (Gauld 41). Gauld comments that âthe preoccupation with death and the afterworld which Freddie had, as a result of his motherâs teachings, by then acquired would now strike the most religious people as altogether morbid, and at times it undoubtedly caused him great unhappinessâ (Gauld 42). Her control and cosseting also provoked rebellion in him, and she noted: âhe is not grateful or humble as I sh. [sic] like to see himâ (Gauld 40). Gauld comments that âhe remained careless of parental instructions, and was arrogant and overbearing with other childrenâ (41). Trevor Hamilton cites a family friend who claimed that Mrs Myers âwas a cold, hard, woman,â and that âFrederick [sic] Myers and his brothers were brought up very carefully if anything too carefully. They were almost prigishly [sic] brought upâ (11). Myers himself referred to her character as of ââthe old schoolâ; â a character of strong but controlled affections, of clear intelligence, unflinching uprightness, profound religious convictionâ (âFragmentsâ 7). Another factor that may have provoked testing behavior is that Frederic had two brothers who came close on his heels, Ernest, when Freddie was one year and eight months old, and Arthur, when Freddie was just over two. The demands on Susanâs time would have increased enormously when her husband suddenly fell ill in the spring of 1851, and then permanently after he died in July 1851. Married just nine years, Susan must have felt abandoned, and she wrote in her diary of her âoverwhelming grief,â âdeep sorrow,â and great sadness (Myers 8). Part of her response was her dogged ambition to have his biography published, at which she failed, and to have published his unpublished writing, Catholic Thoughts (1873) and Lectures on Great Men (1856) at which she succeeded. His death also necessitated a move away from the beloved Lake District, first to a small house in Blackheath, and then, in 1856, to Cheltenham, where her sons could attend Cheltenham College as day boys, since, as Myers put it, âshe wished to keep her sons with herâ (7â8). Most importantly, again in Myersâs own words, she âmade our welfare the absorbing interest of her lifeâ (7). Myersâs sense of loss is implied in his retrospective, romantic description of the Keswick Parsonage garden where he claimed âmy conscious life beganâ: âThe memories of those years swim and sparkle in a haze of light and dew. The thought of Paradise is interwoven for me with that gardenâs gloryâ (âFragmentsâ 7).
The consequences of Myersâs enmeshed relationship with his mother begin to be seen in his precocity and, in Hamiltonâs words, âconsiderable, possibly even overweening, sense of his own worth and statusâ (16). While Myersâs âawe-struck joyâ and âreverent emotionâ at first learning and hearing Virgilâs poetry is associated with his father, the contents of his own earliest poems would seem to draw on preoccupations and feelings associated with both parents. In 1857, at age fourteen while at Cheltenham, he penned two poems about Belisarius, the Byzantine general unjustly imprisoned and betrayed by his adulterous wife. At first glance these seem unusual subject matter for a youth, but Myersâs father had written a volume on Great Men, and Frederic senior may have been presented as one by Susan. Both poems suggest that fame will outlast shame and ensure survival. One ends: âNot in vain to mourn and struggle, not in vain in shame to die / For my fame shall live beyond me, and the recompense is nighâ (60). Both poems also blame women for wrongs done: âIt was a woman drove me into penury and nightâ (53). His other early poems focus on death and subsequent glory, such as his memorial for Robbie Burns (penned at age fifteen), âthe Death of Socratesâ (age sixteen), and âThe Prince of Wales at the Tomb of Washington.â The last-mentioned features Washingtonâs communication from beyond the grave that he does not want pardon for revolting from his fatherâs rod, and he compares this to a family dynamic: âNeither can one consent for ever bind / Parent and offspring, but they shall at length / A closer union in disunion find, / In separation strengthâ (87). It is tempting to speculate that Myers might here be trying to justify or rationalize the loss of his father. Interestingly, in the poem the Prince does not respond to the voice of Washington, but âIn solemn silence turned him from the spotâ (90).
âThe Prince of Walesâ was the first poem to gain Myers notoriety when he went up to Cambridge at the early age of seventeen. Myers won the Chancellorâs medal for it in 1861 and he recited it at the Cambridge Senate house in an âuncompromising singsongâ which was âreceived with an ominous sound of decided disapproval, compounded of laughs, groans, catcalls, and hisses,â according to a contemporary, E. M. Oakley (83â84). However, at the end of the recital he received âa regular ovationâ (84). Oakley claimed that Myers âwas popularly regarded in the University as a rara avis in terris, certainly eccentric, probably negligibleâ (83). However, his self-absorption and arrogance would lead to much greater notoriety when he was accused of plagiarizing a number of lines from an Oxford Prize Poem collection (Beer 120) in his poem which won the Camden medal for classical verse (the second time he had won this prize). Myers was excelling at Cambridge as an intellect, an athlete, and in religion, so that he came to be known as âthe superb,â as he noted in his daily diary (as quoted in Hamilton 21). Evidently this went to his head, as he recollected: âHaving won a Latin prize poem, I was fond of alluding to myself as a kind of Virgil among my young companions. Writing again a similar poem, I saw in my bookshelves a collection of Oxford prize poems which I picked up somewhere in order to gloat over their inferiority to my ownâ (as quoted in Beer 122â23). He deliberately âforcedâ into his poem the best lines (which he referred to as âcollecting gold from Enniusâ dung heapâ), and then was surprised when he was forced to resign the prize and a vote was taken on whether he would be prevented from taking his degree (Beer 122). In an explanatory letter to his uncle, Myers admitted to being âfoolish, reckless, & headstrongâ and of âacting on crude and sometimes presumptuous opinions without considering or regarding what others will thinkâ (as quoted in Beer 125). He also acknowledged the momentous consequences: âmy name has been held up to scorn and reproach in a great number of newspapers[,] for example Athenaeum, (as I am told), Guardian ⊠many of my acquaintance have had their opinion of me greatly shaken & my mother has been and is seriously distressedâ (as quoted in Beer 126). Nor was this an isolated incident, as Myers himself recollected: âmany another act of swaggering folly mars for me the recollection of years which might have brought pure advancing congenial toilâ (as quoted in Beer 123). Myers was definitely manifesting a resistant dimension in his personality. Hamilton documents that Myers cultivated an anti-intellectual front and that he went through a temporary homosexual phase. He stresses that âMyers had a desire to posture and shock as a young man (and occasionally throughout his life)â (24). By the time Myers graduated from Cambridge at twenty-two with two first-class degrees and a reputation as an intellect and poet, âhe was without intellectual and emotional securityâ (Hamilton 33).
His arrogance and isolation mark a typical avoidant response to unmanageable and misunderstood feeling, and this pattern strikingly emerges in two voyages he made, to Greece and America. During the years from sixteen to twenty-three he seems to have projected much of his emotional turmoil into his passion for Hellenism. For him âthe classics were but intensifications of my own being. They drew from me and fostered evil as well as good; they might...