SECTION TWO
CHANGES IN AND AFTER HERGĂ
CHAPTER FIVE
CONTINUING CLEAR LINE 1983â2013
Matthew Screech
INTRODUCTION
Clear line is a term famously coined by the Dutch artist Joost Swarte to define a graphic style that began in The Adventures of Tintin during the late 1930s and early 1940s. Clear line was further popularized by HergĂ©âs emulators and collaborators at Le Journal de Tintin, who became known as the Brussels school. Pierre Sterckx discerns three indispensable components to HergĂ©âs graphics (âSilencesâ 4â18). The first derives from classical realismâs authenticating tradition. Meticulously researched, closely copied pictures of familiar objects and places create the illusion that Tintin, a fictional hero, really exists. Of course HergĂ©âs mimetic realism, for all its detail, is selective. As Le Journal de Tintin was conservatively Roman Catholic, overt sex and violence are filtered out. Clear line conjures up an idealized reality, where angelic Tintin triumphs over evil. The second component is geometric, and it concerns how panels are organized. HergĂ© complies with perspective and proportion; contours are precise and clearly defined, particularly as there is no shadow; carefully arranged people and decor are rendered in continuous black lines of regular thickness; those lines enhance HergĂ©âs pastel colors, resulting in a pleasant luminosity. The third component disrupts the prevailing rationality with humorous, caricatural, clownish elements, which include: onomatopoeia, multicolored stars or sweat beads, and spiraling arabesques denoting movement.
Sterckx elaborates on why, despite HergĂ©âs apparent simplicity, nobody has recaptured his style: all of the components are essential. However, as each story unfolds, the consummate draftsman subtly shifts his emphasis from one to another. Other artists, by contrast, adopt this or that aspect of HergĂ©, without synthesizing all three. One example is Blake & Mortimer, by the Brussels school artist Edgar Jacobs. This sci-fi spy thriller, based in 1950s/60s England, has more shaded tones than The Adventures of Tintin, as well as more text. Jacobsâs mimetism equals (or surpasses) HergĂ©âs, and he shares HergĂ©âs geometric rigor, yet Jacobs barely engages with HergĂ©âs humorous component: his charactersâ movements are theatrical, and their reactions are naturalistic.
Bruno Lecigneâs landmark study Les HĂ©ritiers dâHergĂ© examines how artists redeployed clear line up to 1983. Since then critics have largely ceased theorizing about how clear line evolved, and very little research is being done into the question, although Paul Gravett wrote two important articles: one delves into clear lineâs origins; the other focuses on later developments, especially the Dutch underground. My essay makes a new contribution to the debate by extending the investigation into clear lineâs evolution as far as 2013. The discussion centers on Dutch, French, and Swiss artists, who have mostly received little sustained critical attention either among Anglophones or in their countries of origin. I retain Lecigneâs and Gravettâs chronological structure, but I am less informed by Jean Baudrillard than is Lecigne, who espouses the philosopher unconditionally. Les HĂ©ritiers dâHergĂ© was not translated into English and never reached a wide Francophone readership; the book bristles with difficult Baudrillardian terminology, it appeared with a small publisher, and it has long been out of print. As a consequence, English, French, and Dutch speakers alike will benefit if we briefly review Les HĂ©ritiers dâHergĂ© as well as some Baudrillard before starting. Baudrillard is celebrated for his provocative insights into society; he is also criticized for hyperbole, unsystematic analyses, and not explaining his terms. I shall not revisit the arguments for and against him here; Mark Poster offers a rĂ©sumĂ© (1â9).
Baudrillardâs âThe Order of Simulacraâ influenced Lecigne (Symbolic Exchange and Death 50â86). Baudrillard contends that, over time, images ceased to have an original reference point in reality, and they evolved into pure simulacra, by which he means copies without an original. The classical period ran from the Renaissance to the modernizing Industrial Revolution. At this stage images had an unquestionable referent in reality underpinned by religion. Industrialization brought rapid change: religious practice declined, and the referent was weakened as simulacra spread by means of mechanically produced images. Todayâs late capitalist era is characterized by pure simulacra, which indicate that the referent is irretrievably lost; pure simulacra pertain to no reality beyond themselves, and examples include Pop Art and graffiti. Baudrillard develops the sociocultural implications in Simulacra and Simulation. This book, published one year before Les HĂ©ritiers dâHergĂ©, also influenced Lecigne. Baudrillard sees simulacra as having become ubiquitous; they are proliferating through the popular mass media, and they dominate every aspect of our thinking, as examples such as the space race, advertising, exhibitions, and Disneyland testify.
Ann Miller points out that Lecigne views The Adventures of Tintin as epitomizing Baudrillardâs evolutionary process, âfrom the confident assumptions in the early albums that the images on the page were signs of the real until, in the final albums, the realist illusion was destroyed and the album became a pure simulacrumâ (Reading 127). Lecigne argues persuasively that HergĂ© and Jacobs perfected classical Brussels school aesthetics. The two artists, respecting principles dating back to antiquity, imitate reality within strict rules, while amusing and instructing the public: tasteful harmony between artistic form (clear line) and ideological content (conservative Catholicism) communicates an unambiguous message exemplified by virtuous, mythological heroes. Tintin, in particular, embodies a Manichaean truth about humanity whose existence is accepted uncritically (19â20, 43â44, 155). Lecigne proceeds to demonstrate how HergĂ©, showing incipient modernist tendencies, gradually left mimetic realism behind, and he cultivated pure, Baudrillardian simulacra instead: The Adventures of Tintin have ever more people, places, and objects that, rather than authenticating fiction, lack any original referent in reality; the only reality lies in the pictures themselves (Lecigne 53â55). The development culminated in The Castafiore Emerald, an album set in the imaginary ChĂąteau de Moulinsart and not supposedly in the real world. The Castafiore Emerald further undermines classical precepts: Tintinâs status as the mythological incarnation of virtue is weakened by a lack of worthy opponents when the villain turns out to be a magpie. Blake & Mortimer halted at the classical stage: well-researched decor authenticates exemplary exploits following a realist tradition.
Lecigne goes on to assert that the next generation were modernists because, going further than HergĂ©, they openly rejected classical Brussels school aesthetics. Again, Lecigne is persuasive. Clear line modernists, to varying degrees, resemble their earlier twentieth-century forbears: they stopped instructing readers with exemplary models; they refused to represent the visual more or less directly; they rebelled against preexisting notions of harmony and taste. Clear line modernism, like its predecessor, coincided with a crisis âin which myth, structure and organization, in a traditional sense, collapseâ (Bradbury and McFarlane 26). Not by accident, the modernist trend emerged during the upheavals of the late 1960s/early 1970s with the Dutch underground: Joost Swarte depicts an amoral universe with no equivalent in reality (Lecigne 53â75). Clear line remained popular in the Netherlands. One later instance is Theo van den Boogaardâs Leon van Oukel, whose misadventures exacerbate clear lineâs propensity for clownishness (Lecigne 91â97). We shall see that Dutch interest in clear line persists to this day.
HergĂ© and Jacobs were unfashionable in postâMay â68 France. Nonetheless, clear lineâs impact became apparent from the mid-1970s with Jacques Tardi. His magnum opus, Les Aventures extraordinaires dâAdĂšle Blanc-Sec, overturns the principles governing classical Brussels school aesthetics: AdĂšleâs adventures, set in early-twentieth-century Paris, ironically subvert clear line artistsâ graphics, as well as their right-thinking myths and ideology (Lecigne 79â81). As Tardiâs style resembles Jacobsâs, AdĂšle Blanc-Sec marks a new phase in simulacra proliferating: Tardi copies Jacobs, who copies HergĂ©; clear line is thus once removed from its original referent. Ted BenoĂźtâs clear line thriller Berceuse Ă©lectrique is closer to Swarte or later HergĂ© than to Tardi: familiar objects abound, but the story lacks status in any determinate reality (Lecigne 123â27).
During the late 1970s and early 1980s, a genre Lecigne defines as neoclassicism came into being (137â53). The clear line was predominantly Jacobsian thanks to Tardi. Neoclassicism adopted Tardiâs historical detail but neither his experiments nor his barbed wit: local color lends adventures credibility, although humor is rare; the Brussels school ideology having gone, sex and violence are permissible. Lecigne judges neoclassicism to be second-rate Tardi. The one exception is Swiss artist Daniel Ceppi, whose StĂ©phane ClĂ©ment: Chroniques dâun voyageur modernized neoclassicism: Ceppi, shunning the usual retro settings, recounts a fugitive backpackerâs escapades in Turkey, Afghanistan, and elsewhere.
Les HĂ©ritiers dâHergĂ© concludes with a hierarchy based on Baudrillard (Lecigne 155â59). If the real is conceivable only in a simulated form, then attempting to represent it accurately is futile. Consequently, neoclassicism is of the lower order: neoclassicism frustrates clear lineâs potential to produce pure simulacra, by fruitlessly recycling classical realismâs authenticating strategy. Above are the modernists, who reject classical aesthetics: their simulacra, by removing the referent in reality, open up innovative possibilities for clear line. Baudrillardâs hypotheses and Lecigneâs value judgments are, by their nature, debatable. Nevertheless, Les HĂ©ritiers dâHergĂ© does provide a valuable starting point for our updated analysis of clear line: it is most pertinent to ask whether or not artists reference the real. What is more, as we shall see, some later artists no longer fit Lecigneâs modernist/neoclassical hierarchy. After the 1980s, innovating ceases to be contingent upon removing the referent in reality.
1983â1993: SIMULACRA AND NEOCLASSICISM
The year 1983 was not just when Lecigne published Les HĂ©ritiers dâHergĂ©. It was also, of course, the year HergĂ© died. The following year, a Swiss artist called Emmanuel Excoffier (aka Exem) drew a tribute titled âLe Jumeau malĂ©fiqueâ for the small Genevan publisher Ăditions Tchang (Exem 1984, repr. Herbez 35â36). Exemâs admiration for HergĂ© could hardly be plainer: his pseudonym, similar to HergĂ©âs, inverts the first two letters of his first and last name. Ariel Herbez observes that Exem has the vivacious caricatures, hot pursuits, and relatively simple backgrounds of earlier HergĂ©; however, Herbez adds that Exem creates simulacra rather than imitating reality (20, 26). Moreover, Exem plays with a Baudrillardian preoccupation: if Tintin is a simulacrum (i.e., a copy of a nonexistent person), then he is reversible; Lecigne insists repeatedly on the reversibility of simulacra (43, 53, 70, 96). Exemâs take on reversibility shows how easily Tintin can be converted into his opposite. He invents Tintinâs identical twin brother, Zinzin, an antihero who embodies everything Tintin is not: Zinzin is a thief, he covets power, he has sex, and he provokes bloodshed. In a second strip, âZinzin maĂźtre du monde,â Tintinâs autopsy (officiated over by HergĂ©) reveals that Tintin is neither male nor female, because his genitalia consists of clear line; the vital organ is promptly snatched away by Zinzin, to misuse for his own purposes (Exem 1985, repr. Herbez 38â44; see figure 1). Zinzin appropriating clear line intimates that clear line has become nothing less than a system of reversible simulacra; an identical point was made by Lecigne when he explained the graphic styleâs transition from classicism to modernism over the previous decade (50, 155).
Some 1970s parodists exploited Tintinâs reversibility, but they simultaneously attacked his mythological standing, usually by sexualizing him (Lecigne 105). Exem does the opposite. Exem remythologizes androgynous Tintin, with a fervor not seen since the Brussels schoolâs classical heyday: Tintin retains his chastity, and his saintliness is accentuated by Zinzin, who would alter HergĂ©an clear line. At the same time, Exem reveals modernist tendencies: the Brussels schoolâs classical realism and its ideological underpinnings are roundly rejected; Tintin is remythologised, but as a reversible simulacrum who enjoys no reality beyond comics. Exemâs blend of classicism and modernism makes him the first artist to fit oddly within Lecigneâs concluding hierarchy.
Lecigne never mentions Exem. However, other clear line artists he tips both as potentially interesting and as continuing the trend HergĂ© started did produce pure simulacra during the next ten years. Dinghys dinghys (1984) by Marc Barcelo and Jean-Yves Tripp recalls Tintin and the Picaros, but it has more violence and less humor. The story recounts a terrorist attack during a masked carnival at a desert oasis, where North African architecture mingles with sheer fantasy in the form of a talking mouse. En pleine guerre froide (1984), a collection of short stories by Jean-Louis Flocâh and Jean-Luc Fromental, moved clear line SF toward Swarte and BenoĂźt: it portrays times and places that remain strangely unfamiliar, despite an abundance of recognizable objects. The album takes the approach to extremes: ultra-high-speed trains coexist alongside 1980s power suits and 1930s streamlining (see figure 2). There are also modernist Le Corbusier constructions and multipurpose spaces reminiscent of 1960s Hyperrealism. HergĂ©an clear lineâs luminosity is intensified by yellows, greens, and oranges, not unlike Pop Art. Several stories are unbridled speculations about simulacra proliferating via the media and popular culture: Walt Disney is a robot (âEn pleine guerre froideâ 9â16); the heroâs likeness is reproduced in newspapers and advertisements (âGrigor Ivanovâ 39â42); a waxwork museumâs owners are models of their nonexistent selves (âBeau dirigeableâ 43â50). A distant planetâs decor comprises what are arguably clear lineâs purest simulacra to date: abstract shapes, referring to no reality whatsoever (âProximiscuitĂ© sur Proximolâ 17â21). The Spanish SF artist Daniel Torres also experimented with clear line simulacra: Opium takes place in an imaginary city of the future.
In the case of Plagiat! (1989) by Alain Goffin, François Schuiten, and BenoĂźt Peeters, a whole album hinges on simulating. Plagiat! has scenes set in a near future redolent of BenoĂźt, but the graphics are closer to Jacobs. The artist hero invents âpure line,â an amalgam of clear line, Surrealism, Pop Art, and abstraction. He then exploits pure lineâs reversibility by signing his own paintings in a plagiaristâs name. In so doing he usurps the plagiaristâs identity in the eyes of the media, who mistakenly believe them both to be the same person. The plagiarist takes his revenge by shooting the artist live on TV, but his motive is never believed, and the murder is attributed to a lone madman. Plagiat! ends with what purports to be a retrospective catalogue dedicated to the artist, perpetuating the media myth of the genius struck down in his prime (45â50). The catalogue authenticates erroneous facts about a fictional life. As a result, documentation no longer references reality; rather, it references what never had any reality to begin with. The only truth lies in simulating. An album titled Captivant by Yves Chaland and Luc Cornillon had produced an analogous effect ten years earlier. Lecigne remarks that Captivant is ostensibly a collection of 1950s comic strip magazines with dates, readersâ letters and competitions; and yet, the magazines referred to never existed; as with Plagiat!, the album is pure simulation (109â11).
Figure 2: © Jean-Louis Flocâh and Jean-Luc Fromental
If artists considered thus far all attest to an interest in simulacra, then Patrick Dumasâs and François RiviĂšreâs MaĂźtre Berger evinces neoclassicismâs ongoing popularity. This detective series, set in late 1940s/1950s France, reinforces the realist component: Jacobsian clear line is transposed onto gentle landscapes and small towns in the southwestern Charentes region. MaĂźtre Berger languishes at the bottom of Lecigneâs Baudrillardian hierarchy, yet, it should not be written off as derivative recycling: the series encapsulates why clear line lends itself so well to crime fiction. As Pierre Fresnault-Deruelle notes, Tintin is sometimes surprised to learn that his worldâs smooth surfaces are nothing but a facade (HergĂ©ologie 77). Similarly, Berger discovers enmities dating back to the Nazi occupation behind the tranquil scenery.
Eric Heuvel and Martin Lodewijkâs Jenny Jones manifests Dutch ne...