Psychology

Humanistic Psychology

Humanistic psychology is a perspective that emphasizes the uniqueness and potential of the individual. It focuses on subjective experiences, personal growth, and self-actualization. Humanistic psychologists believe that people have the capacity to make choices and strive for personal fulfillment, and they emphasize the importance of empathy and understanding in therapeutic relationships.

Written by Perlego with AI-assistance

12 Key excerpts on "Humanistic Psychology"

  • Book cover image for: Handbook on Teaching Educational Psychology
    • Donald J. Treffinger, J. Kent Davis, Richard E. Ripple, Donald J. Treffinger, J. Kent Davis, Richard E. Ripple(Authors)
    • 2013(Publication Date)
    • Academic Press
      (Publisher)
    I think another way of saying this is that Humanistic Psychology considers people in terms of what it means to feel and live and think and behave as human beings. It lends itself easily and readily to general discussions or probing analyses of personal ideals, of fulfillment, of self-actualization, and of authenticity and what it means to be real. Child (1973) suggests that perhaps the most persuasive virtue of Humanistic Psychology is the intuitive Tightness of the model. By this he does not mean absolute correctness, but rather that the humanistic model is one that agrees with most people's intuitive impression of what it is like to be a human being, and that this agreement is one important item of positive evidence for the scientific value of the model [p. 18]. Your experience may have shown you, as mine has, that when people seek self-understanding or insight into their feeling worlds or search for solutions to emotional hauntings, they usually do not choose books that explain behavior only in terms of stimulus conditions and response possibilities. Rather, what 148 Don E. Hamachek they do is to choose books and articles that allow them to explore the inner person, the hidden self in more personal, affective ways. Humanistic Psychology encourages this latter kind of learning, which is why, I suspect, it has a strong natural appeal to many. Another strength of the humanistic position is that it offers a flexible framework within which to observe and study behavior. It is an open rather than a closed system. Humanistic Psychology used properly is not a psychology that says feelings are more important than thinking or personal perceptions are more crucial than observable behavior. It is, or at least should be, a psychology which considers the total person in a total environment of interpersonal relationships and intrapersonal feelings.
  • Book cover image for: Hergenhahn's An Introduction to the History of Psychology
    Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it. H U M A N I S T I C ( T H I R D -F O R C E ) P S Y C H O L O G Y 549 a small fraction of the people who call themselves “humanistic psychologists.” (pp. 739, 743) As William James said, if existing methods are ineffective for studying certain aspects of human nature, it is not those aspects of human nature that are to be discarded but the methods. To be fair, humanistic psychologists do not want to discard sci-entific inquiry; they want to expand our conception of what a human science should be. Indeed, the expansion of psychology’s domain is arguably Humanistic Psychology’s major contribu-tion to the discipline. In psychology, there is now an increased tendency to study the whole person. We are concerned with not only how people learn, think, and mature biologically and intellectu-ally but also how people formulate plans to attain future goals and why people laugh, cry, and cre-ate meaning in their lives. In the opinion of many, the humanistic paradigm has breathed new life into psychology. Recently, a field called positive psychology has developed that, like traditional Humanistic Psychology, explores positive human attributes. Seligman and Csikszentmihalyi (2000) describe what positive psychology has in common with traditional Humanistic Psychology and what makes it different: [The purpose of positive psychology] is to remind our field that psychology is not just the study of pathology, weak-ness, and damage; it is also the study of strength and virtue. Treatment is not just fixing what is broken; it is nurturing what is best. Psychology is not just a branch of medicine concerned with illness or health; it is much larger.
  • Book cover image for: Psychology
    eBook - PDF

    Psychology

    Six Perspectives

    Humanistic Psychology did not displace psychoanalysis, which still has wide appeal in the public domain and stimulates research in child develop-ment and unconscious cognitive processes. With its fewer empirical findings, it did not displace behaviorism, which continues today with specialized research and specific applications in everyday life. Instead, Humanistic Psychology has existed on the periphery of academic psychology, flourishing Humanistic Psychology —— 179 with the many practical applications of its approach to therapy while at the same time retaining its comparatively loose structure. Less directly, the humanistic movement resisted the premises in biological psychology, which reduced explanations of psychological phenomena to physio-logical processes. When searching outside its borders, Humanistic Psychology looks instead to philosophical and related literatures, which examine human experience in broader terms. To investigate the topics of personal growth, feelings, and meanings in life, humanistic psychologists sometimes turn to phenomenology , studying nature according to how things seem to the observer, rather than what they may be objectively. The intention is to suspend all everyday interpretations and explanations insofar as possible, concentrating more on the mental experience and less on the observed object or event. Perceiving a flower, phe-nomenological observers, in their imaginations, may vary different charac-teristics of the flower and even different ways of visually apprehending it, striving to experience the essence of the flower or the essence of seeing the flower. More philosophical than psychological, phenomenology aims to ignore the antecedents and consequences surrounding sensation and percep-tion. Instead, the elusive goal becomes a direct investigation of conscious-ness, free of preconceived notions.
  • Book cover image for: Theoretical Approaches in Psychology
    • Matt Jarvis(Author)
    • 2005(Publication Date)
    • Routledge
      (Publisher)
  • Humanistic Psychology has given us a simple, accessible and effective model of counselling. This has meant that many more people have access to psychological help than would probably be the case otherwise.
  • Perhaps most importantly, Humanistic Psychology is alone in the major psychological approaches in emphasising the positive aspects of human nature and adopting a thoroughly positive attitude to humanity.
  • Despite these contributions, it is almost certain that Humanistic Psychology will remain a subversive element in psychology rather than part of mainstream psychology. Some of the major limitations of a humanistic approach are as follows:
    • To an even greater extent than the psychodynamic approach, Humanistic Psychology has generated theories and ideas that have proved very difficult to test by scientific investigation.
    • Because the subject matter of Humanistic Psychology is the experience of the individual person, there is a logical problem of applying theories generated from one individual to another. We cannot for example assume that two people experience the same thing when they speak of a peak or spiritual experience.
    • Many humanistic ideas (particularly those around the development of the self) are extremely culture bound, and cannot easily be applied to a range of societies or historical periods.
    • The humanistic emphasis on the individual person means that the importance of external influences on people’s lives have probably been underestimated. As Lerman (1992) has pointed out, a battered wife can learn through Humanistic Psychology that she has a right not to be abused, but it does not in itself allow her to leave the situation safely.

    Summary

    Humanistic Psychology emerged through the work of Rogers and Maslow, who sought to create a third force in psychology to escape the restrictions of behavioural and psychodynamic psychology. They proposed a simple and optimistic psychology with a minimum of theory that would address what people described as important experiences. The major application of Humanistic Psychology is in counselling, where the experience of the individual is of paramount importance. Although the humanistic perspective remains important, it has limited influence in psychological research because of its untestable ideas and emphasis on the experiences of the individual.
  • Book cover image for: Person-Centred Counselling Psychology
    eBook - ePub
    In this chapter we shall consider the relationship between the person-centred approach and each of these four paradigms, focusing on how person-centred therapy relates to their core assumptions as well as the therapeutic theories and practices they encompass. The chapter represents nothing more than a snapshot of such relationships, and is thus a generalised account rather than a comprehensive overview. Furthermore, the limited extent to which we are able to explore the complexities of each paradigm means that the chapter cannot purport to provide a detailed analysis of these, but instead offer only a basic summary of each. Such an outcome is not ideal, but an inevitable product of our focus being person-centred therapy rather than counselling psychology per se. Any reader wishing a more comprehensive understanding of the therapeutic paradigms presented here, or indeed the therapeutic approaches they encompass, is advised to consult more complete accounts, such as those contained in Woolfe. et al. (2003). Our exploration will instead attempt to summarise the place of the person-centred approach within its counselling psychology context, which is an important undertaking in terms of our goal to explore person-centred therapy from a psychological perspective. Our starting point for this is the humanistic paradigm, and the relationship of the person-centred approach to it.
    The humanistic paradigm
    The humanistic paradigm emerged in the USA during the 1950s and 1960s, and rapidly become known as the ‘third force’ (Bugenthal, 1964) in psychology due to its philosophical differences with behaviourist and psychodynamic standpoints, the first and second forces respectively. In many ways, Humanistic Psychology was a reaction to these two forces, rejecting the Freudian emphasis on destructive, unconscious urges and the over-simplified, laboratory based analyses provided by behaviourism. For Bugenthal (1964), the humanistic paradigm evolved on the basis of five fundamental postulates (or principles). These are:
     
    1. Human beings, as human, supersede the sum of their parts. They cannot be reduced to components or isolated elements.
    2. Human beings have their existence in a uniquely human context, as well as in a cosmic and ecological setting.
    3. Human beings are aware, and also aware of being aware – i.e., they are conscious. Human consciousness always includes an awareness of oneself in the context of other people.
    4. Human beings have some choice, and thus responsibility.
    5. Human beings are intentional and goal-orientated. They are aware that they cause future events and seek meaning, value and creativity.
     
    While each of these postulates highlights a specific aspect of humanistic thinking, they also hint at an underlying philosophy encompassing a small number of core themes. For example, the proposition that human beings are something more than the sum of their parts (i.e. cannot be reduced to components) reflects the theme of holism, a standpoint stressing the importance of viewing people as unique
  • Book cover image for: Theories of Personality
    P A RT 5 Humanistic/Existential Perspectives The theories considered in this section of the text are part of the third-force move- ment in contemporary psychology. (The other two movements are psychoanalysis and behaviorism.) The term was coined by Abraham Maslow (Chapter 12) to describe a position that focuses on the creative potentialities inherent in human beings and that seeks ways to help them realize their highest and most important goals. Virtually all of the humanistic theories postulate the existence of an innate growth mechanism within individuals that will move them toward realization of their potentialities if environmental conditions are right. This growth process has been variously labeled by its numerous proponents as the drive toward self- actualization, self-realization, or selfhood. The roots of the humanistic movement can be found in the writings of Jung, Adler, Horney, Kohut, Allport, Maslow, Rogers, May, and others. These theorists all emphasize the uniqueness of individuals and believe that all individuals should be free to make their own choices about the direction they want to take in their own lives. People should be allowed to organize and control their own behavior; they should not be controlled by society. Society is generally seen as the “bad guy,” the enforcer of rules and regulations that stifle personal growth. According to the humanists, a benevolent, helpful attitude toward people allows them to grow and prosper. Most societies, they believe, attempt to coerce indivi- duals into behaving appropriately, that is, normally. The result is rather dull, conventional people who usually obey, without much question, the moral pre- scriptions of the majority. In other words, the result is the average, law-abiding man or woman. The humanistic psychologists argue, instead, for allowing individuals to develop to their fullest potential. They see people as naturally striving to be crea- tive and happy rather than mediocre and conventional.
  • Book cover image for: Personality
    eBook - PDF
    The third force in American psychology caught on rapidly with a large number of psychotherapists and personality theorists. The emphasis on indi-viduality and personal expression in the 1960s (which gave rise to the coun-terculture movement personified by Jim Morrison) provided fertile soil for the growth of Humanistic Psychology. The election of prominent humanistic psychologist Abraham Maslow to president of the American Psychological Association in 1967 symbolized the acceptance of the humanistic approach as a legitimate alternative perspective. Humanistic Psychology never did overthrow psychoanalysis or behavior-ism, but it did manage to make a niche for itself among the major approaches to understanding human personality. Although not as popular as it once was, there remains an active community of humanistic psychologists and a large number of psychotherapists who identify with this perspective. The Roots of Humanistic Psychology Although Humanistic Psychology evolved from many sources, its roots lie pri-marily in two areas: existential philosophy, which is decidedly European in flavor, and the work of some American psychologists, most notably Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow. Existential philosophy addresses many of the questions that later became cornerstones of the humanistic approach. Some of these include the meaning of our existence, the role of free will, and the uniqueness of each human being. Some psychologists align themselves so closely with existential philoso-phers that they have adopted the label existential psychologists . The list of prominent existential psychologists includes Ludwig Binswanger, Medard Boss, Viktor Frankl, R. D. Laing, and Rollo May. Existential psychotherapy frequently focuses on existential anxiety — the feelings of dread and panic that follow the realization that there is no meaning to one ’ s life. Therapy often emphasizes the freedom to choose and develop a lifestyle that reduces feelings of emptiness, anxiety, and boredom.
  • Book cover image for: Ordinary Ecstasy
    eBook - ePub

    Ordinary Ecstasy

    The Dialectics of Humanistic Psychology

    • John Rowan(Author)
    • 2015(Publication Date)
    • Routledge
      (Publisher)
    But in fact the two things are like chalk and cheese. The main plank in Humanistic Psychology is the integration of body, feelings, intellect, soul and spirit, and it says so very clearly in all the introductory leaflets put out by AHP affiliates in various countries around the world. This integration is the key to what we call self-actualization, and all our workshops touch on it in some way. The secular humanists, on the other hand, are often not much interested in the body or in feelings, and actively deny any existence to the spiritual or transpersonal aspects of our life.
    I actually joined the British Humanist Association (BHA) at one time, to See whether any links could be made, but I found the people involved in it to be aridly intellectual, unawarely sexist and very narrow, spending a lot of their time and energy knocking Christianity, and some of the rest on issues like abortion and euthanasia. I lasted a year and walked out in protest at the sexism expressed at the Annual General Meeting.
    Now it may well be that secular humanism should not be judged by the activities of the BHA (or the National Secular Society, which it much resembles) because humanism is itself a much wider philosophy. Nevertheless, the BHA is trying to represent it, and there must be some connection somewhere. None of these things is Humanistic Psychology.
    Passage contains an image

    2 Humanistic Psychology is and is Not Optimistic

    When people first come across Humanistic Psychology, they usually find it presented as full of blue-sky optimism. This is because the presentation is restricted to Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers. What I want to say here is that Humanistic Psychology is not restricted to these, but also includes people like James Bugental, Rollo May, Kirk Schneider and Alvin Mahrer who are not particularly optimistic at all.

    Maslow and Mahrer

    Abraham Maslow is a very important pioneer figure in Humanistic Psychology. His theory of human needs and human development says that there is a normal process of growth which applies to all people (see Table 2.1
  • Book cover image for: The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, Clinical, Applied, and Cross-Cultural Research
    Our children now can reach out to the cosmos, yet not know how to nurture each other. To Glasser (1938), a prime culprit in this disparity is “stimulus-response.” He declares that no one truly responds to a stimulus; one responds out of personal choice, e.g. going through a stop sign at three in the morning, or deciding not to answer a ringing phone. Glasser insists that all behavior is chosen; therefore, one is responsible for all s/he does. Humanism as a psychology approach can only flourish in a culture that values Humanism as a philosophy. Many humanistic practitioners follow the existential writings of philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre and others in focusing on the importance of being and the meaning of life. This is a reaction to quick-fix therapies that endeavor to solve a single immediate problem and not go deeper. As Carl Rogers has expressed, a plant is neither good nor bad but rather grows to its healthy maturity given a nurturing environment of water, sun, and soil. In the same way, humans are not good or bad, and in a nurturing cli-mate will strive toward their own organismic health (Rogers, 1987). Humanistic practitioners believe their way may lead a troubled culture to find its healthy path. More than any other, humanistic-existential therapy models democracy, imposes upon the client least of all. Freedom to choose is maximized. Each person’s human poten-tial is validated. Many other therapeutic approaches advocate intake interviews and the Clinical Applications of Humanistic Theory of Personality 30 collection of historical data. The sessions themselves include note taking and a myriad of questions. From the humanistic perspective, the therapist wishes to encounter the client freshly, in the moment, with no pre-session bias, two people meeting and learning from each other. The therapist does not think of self as the expert one and the client as the poor, suffering, and by implication, less than, needy one.
  • Book cover image for: A History of Psychology in Metascientific Perspective
    • K.B. Madsen(Author)
    • 1988(Publication Date)
    • North Holland
      (Publisher)
    Introduction to the period 407 though divided into microschools each concentrating on a specialized field. We shall examine this school in a later chapter on 'Mainstream Psychology'. The h u man istic psychologists The Development of Humanistic Psychology INSPIRATION. As mentioned above, during the 1950's psychologists became increasingly dissatisfied with the paradigm of integrating psychology. Some of them had never accepted this paradigm and kept at a critical distance. Nor were they able to accept logical empiricism or other types of Anglo-Saxon analytical philosophy of science, which predominated during the period of integration - especially in the U.S.A, which took the lead as far as psychology was concerned during this period. These outsiders were more interested in other schools of philosophy; these had existed for some time, though had been unable to com- pete with the analytical schools (logical empiricism, Oxford philosophy, pragmatism, etc.), which especially attracted those interested in the natural sci- ences. Not until society underwent the changes mentioned above under 'external causes' did these alternative philosophies begin to make an impact among psychologists, social researchers and humanists. From Europe came existential philosophy, chiefly represented by S . Kierkegaard, M. Heidegger, L. Binswanger, K. Jaspers and J.P. Sartre. These philosophers were not interested in the philosophy of science, nor in the phi- losophy of nature (ontology, metaphysics) but largely in the philosophy of val- ues (the philosophy of life, moral philosophy, etc.) Thus it was man's existen- tial problems - a meaningful contra a meaningless existence, life contra death, the correct conduct of life (morality, ethics) and other problems connected with the philosophy of life - that interested them. Existentialism frequently went hand in hand with phenomenological philosophy, which originated with E.
  • Book cover image for: Personality
    eBook - PDF
    In the freedom provided by the therapist’s unconditional support, clients peel away their defenses, accept who they are, and begin to appreciate all of life’s experiences. Today a large number of psychotherapists identify their approach as humanistic (Cook, Biyanova, Elhai, Schnurr, & Coyne, 2010), and many others include aspects of person-centered therapy in their work (Cain & Seeman, 2002). Reviews of empirical studies find considerable evidence for the effectiveness of humanistic psychotherapy and for approaches to therapy that focus on humanistic concepts like finding meaning in one’s life (Angus, Watson, Elliott, Schneider, & Timulak, 2015; Elliott, 2002; Vohs, Craig, & Cooper, 2015). Not only do many clients benefit from the person-centered approach, but the effects of the treatment can often be seen many months after the therapy sessions end. Assessment: The Q-Sort Technique A persistent challenge for psychotherapists of all stripes is to demonstrate the effectiveness of their treatment. Carl Rogers was very aware of this chal- lenge and strongly encouraged research on the effectiveness of person-centered psychotherapy. Too often therapy is declared a success simply because the thera- pist and client feel there has been improvement. However, without empirical evi- dence of therapeutic change, Rogers argued, psychologists are in danger of fooling themselves. So how can a humanistic psychologist demonstrate that clients are more fully functioning or closer to self-actualization after a few months of therapy? One tool that has proven useful is a procedure called the Q-Sort. The basic procedure was developed several decades ago (Stephenson, 1953) and has been used to assess a wide variety of psychological concepts, including parent–child attachment (Tarabulsky et al., 2008), defense mechanisms (Davidson & MacGregor, 1996), temperament (Buckley, Klein, Durbin, Hayden, & Moerk, 2002), and strength of romantic relationships (Bengston & Grotevant, 1999).
  • Book cover image for: Virtues and Vices in Positive Psychology
    eBook - PDF
    Nevertheless, positive psychologists cross swords with certain aspects of all those earlier psychological trends. In particular, they enjoy a tempestuous love-hate relationship with the Humanistic Psychology of Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow. On one hand, they applaud its focus on the individual’s potential for self-change and self-enhancement. On the other, they resent the grandmotherly tone and lack of scientific rigour in Humanistic Psychology, its alleged conflation of description with prescription, its assumption of human beings’ inherent goodness and its easy degeneration into self-help mantras about narcissistic happiness in lieu of meaningful and collective well-being (see e.g. Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000, p. 7). In contrast to the human- ists’ soft-headedness and proselytising tendencies, they contend, psychol- ogy must retain its scientific credibility as ‘hard-headed and dispassionate’ (Peterson, 2006, p. 15). Having taken the humanists to task, positive psychologists fault the adaptability-and-efficiency psychologies of the 1980s and 1990s for refusing to take seriously the moral factors that make life worth living for most people. They complain, inter alia, that the idea of emotional intelligence conflates the virtuous regulation of emotions with mere instrumental cleverness, and that self-esteem theory champions feeling good about oneself whether or not one has anything worthy to feel good about (see e.g. Seligman, 2002; cf. Kristjánsson, 2010a, chap. 5). Positive psychologists see a conspicuous moral gap in all this literature, therefore: positive features are considered achievable merely on the grounds of cleverness and efficiency, without regard for ethical
  • Index pages curate the most relevant extracts from our library of academic textbooks. They’ve been created using an in-house natural language model (NLM), each adding context and meaning to key research topics.