Raine et al 1997

4 Key excerpts on "Raine et al 1997"

• 

  eBook - ePub

  The Essential Criminology Reader

  • Stuart Henry(Author)
  • 2018(Publication Date)
  • Routledge

    (Publisher)

  The resulting integration of research findings from various disciplines has direct implications for the study of crime and criminal behavior by providing a scientific foundation for philosophical viewpoints and should appeal to social scientists who hold widely divergent views and beliefs. This research compels the reader to acknowledge several decades of serious scientific criminological inquiry in psychology, psychiatry, and the neuro-biological sciences. Findings account for intra-psychic and extra-psychic variables in their emphasis on the recent explosion of genetic and biological evidence that certain aspects of brain function may underlie violent and impulsive behaviors by sensitizing the actor to adverse social stimuli (Pallone and Hennessy 1996).

  Several substantial works published in the past ten years provide contemporary research overviews and integrative perspectives with direct relevance to the field of criminology (e.g., Bock and Goode 1996; Fish-bein 1996, 2000, 2004; Hillbrand and Pallone 1993; Pallone and Hennessy 1996; Raine, 1993; Raine et al. 1997a; Reiss et al. 1994; Rowe et al. 1998a, 1998b; Tarter and Vanyukov 1994; Volavka 1995). Although they acknowledge that biological research on various types of antisocial behavior is still in short supply, not always clearly enunciated, and rife with conceptual and theoretical issues not yet resolved, they also demonstrate that integrative works are actively in progress, report many consistent findings, and provide direction in potentially important and fruitful methodological approaches. This research has been instrumental in identifying aspects of brain function and environmental triggers that may relate to various antisocial behaviors warranting further investigation.

  In spite of this progress, several limitations in the research remain. For one, many so-called “interdisciplinary” works tend to focus on biological factors and, rather than attempt to estimate relative influences, simply control for social variables. Also, many studies do not account for ongoing environmental influences on biological conditions but instead treat them as if they were fixed and uncorrectable. Furthermore, this body of research has not yet accounted for population or group-wide collective aggression and antisocial behavior or for the antisocial practices of corporations and political bodies. Further compounding the isolation of disciplines, there remains unfamiliarity with and resistance to interdisciplinary perspectives, and there has been a lack of communication among various branches of investigation. Unfamiliarity with genetic and biological terminology, methodology, and underlying mechanisms has hindered exchanges between social and biological researchers. These shortfalls, among many others, could be addressed by the behavioral sciences in more meaningful ways by incorporating the perspectives and methodologies of social scientists. More in-depth examination of this important research domain is essential for practitioners, academicians, policymakers, and social scientists who would greatly benefit from its knowledge (see Raine and Liu 1998).

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  The Handbook of Forensic Psychopathology and Treatment

  • Maaike Cima(Author)
  • 2016(Publication Date)
  • Routledge

    (Publisher)

  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, version 5 (DSM-5), as a specifier to conduct disorder, termed ‘limited prosocial emotions’ (mostly focusing on callous-unemotional traits), will likely stimulate such subtyping practices both in research and clinical practice. Notably, though, we believe that neurobiological differences among ED juveniles are likely to be captured best by a multidimensional operationalisation of psychopathic traits, a notion that is clearly at odds with the simplistic notion of adequate versus ‘limited prosocial emotions’ embraced by DSM-5. As such, we applaud the inclusion of this specifier, but (1) emphasise that its clinical validity still requires rigorous validation (e.g. Colins & Vermeiren, 2013) and (2) suggest that it may need refining in future versions of the DSM to take into account the multidimensionality of the psychopathy construct and/or further subtyping based on within-trait heterogeneity with respect to callous-unemotional traits (e.g. Fanti, Demetriou, & Kimonis, 2013; Kimonis, Fanti, Isoma, & Donoghue, 2013). Finally, there are indications for the effects of early childhood experiences on neurobiological atypicalities, which in turn may confer vulnerability to internalising and externalising psychopathology, warranting not only primary prevention and early detection of family violence at the societal level, but also environmental enrichment programmes which have been shown to reduce antisocial outcomes in the general population (Raine, Mellingen, Liu, Venables, & Mednick, 2003) and may do so in at-risk samples.

  Concluding remarks

  The suggestions made above exemplify several of the potential uses of biological studies in ED juveniles. In a general sense, we have argued that such studies carry the promise of (1) more specific diagnostics, (2) targeted personalised interventions and development of new interventions, (3) enhanced risk assessment and (4) treatment evaluation (Popma & Raine, 2006). While most lay readers will applaud the clinical use of neurobiological measures, their use in forensic risk assessment and criminal law are not regarded without scepticism. Again, development in the field of neurobiological research on ED juveniles is paralleled by those in the field of neurobiological research on typical adolescence. In an excellent review, Steinberg (2009) ruminates on the validity of using the latter neuroscientific evidence to inform public policy, and finally decides:

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  Forensic Psychology

  • David A. Crighton, Graham J. Towl, David A. Crighton, Graham J. Towl(Authors)
  • 2021(Publication Date)
  • Wiley-Blackwell

    (Publisher)

  2003 ).

  As developmental theories may be ideal for informing future intervention and public policy directions (Brennan et al., 2003 ), criminal justice systems in general and forensic psychology in particular stand to benefit tremendously from their application. Moreover, neurobiological research—with its extensive contributions to criminological study dating back more than a century (i.e., Lombroso, 1876 )—has offered a unique understanding of the aetiological mechanisms underlying antisocial behaviour and provided a sizeable evidence base for developmental criminological perspectives. This chapter will serve as an integrative review of findings from key areas of neurobiological research on antisocial behaviour, with particular focus upon developmental perspectives and associated theories. Additionally, it will provide an overview of current and potential application of this research within forensic arenas—which may be of value in informing clinical practitioners.

  GENETICS

  Genetic predispositions towards antisocial behaviour provide an ideal starting point for a discussion of developmental neurobiological crime research. Twin studies, adoptive studies, studies in twins reared apart and molecular genetic studies have provided substantial evidence for genetic influences on antisocial and aggressive behaviour (Popma and Raine, 2006 ); though published estimates of heritability vary widely among studies (Waldman and Rhee, 2006 ), the genetic contribution is thought overall to be 40–50% (Moffitt, 2005 ). Variability may be due in part to the use of a variety of semi‐overlapping phenotypes (i.e., the detectable expression of an individual’s genotype interacting with their environment; Walsh and Ellis, 2007 )—including dimensional personality traits (e.g., impulsivity and aggressiveness), psychiatric diagnoses (e.g., antisocial personality disorder [ASPD], conduct disorder [CD]) and behaviour (e.g., crime and delinquency) related to antisociality—which are considered less than ideal (Goldman and Ducci, 2007 ). Some genetic determinants of antisociality are common to other externalising disorders (i.e., the aforementioned disorders, along with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], alcoholism and other addictions; Goldman and Ducci, 2007 ) and may be explained by intermediate endophenotypic expressions (Waldman and Rhee, 2006 ). Additionally, several monoamine neurotransmitter genes have demonstrated a genetic association with antisocial behaviour (Goldman and Ducci, 2007 ), including those coding for precursor, receptor, transporter, metabolite or conversion elements in the serotonin and catecholamine (i.e., dopamine and norepinephrine) neurotransmitter systems (e.g., 5‐hydroxytryptamine receptor 1B, tryptophan hydroxylase, 5‐hydroxytryptamine transporter, monoamine oxidase A [MAOA] and catechol‐O‐methyltransferase; Goldman and Ducci, 2007 ; Waldman and Rhee, 2006 )—systems thought to modulate aggressive and impulsive behaviour. None of these candidate genes, however, accounts for a large amount of phenotypic variance in antisociality (Goldman and Ducci, 2007

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  The Ashgate Research Companion to Biosocial Theories of Crime

  • Anthony Walsh, Kevin M. Beaver(Authors)
  • 2016(Publication Date)
  • Taylor & Francis

    (Publisher)

  However, findings to date are still a long way from elucidating the complicated interactional processes of the brain and environment as they relate to outcomes of criminal behavior. One specific goal for future studies will be to determine more specifically which brain morphological/functional factors play an important role in this biosocial interactive process of leading to criminal behavior. Another goal will be to determine whether particular social risk factors interact with particular brain predispositions to produce criminal outcomes (e.g., environmental stress may be more likely to trigger criminal behavior if a biological predisposition of amygdala deficits is present that lower the person’s ability to handle stressful events). Future developmental studies with more sophisticated assessments on the environment and the brain will provide invaluable information for understanding the etiological equation of criminal behavior. Psychophysiology Although an extensive body of research has been built up on the psychophysiological basis of antisocial and criminal behavior (see reviews by Lorber, 2004 ; Patrick, 2008), relatively fewer studies have been conducted to examine the possible interaction effects with psychosocial variables. Most psychophysiological research in the biosocial studies has focused on autonomic nervous system functioning at a baseline level or in response to external stimuli using measures such as skin conductance activity and heart rate. Skin conductance is usually measured from electrodes placed on the fingers or palm of the hand and is controlled exclusively by the sympathetic nervous system. Skin conductance activity captures small fluctuations in the electrical activity of the skin, with enhanced conductivity (i.e., activity) elicited by increased sweating

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book