Broad impact of mental illness
Despite the best efforts of scientists and clinicians, mental illnesses are often resistant to pharmacological and to behavioral/cognitive treatments. Moreover, even when a positive response is obtained, residual features of the illness may persist, and illness recurrence is notably high. Making matters worse, mental illnesses are frequently comorbid with other psychological problems, as well as numerous physical disorders. In some instances, the comorbid conditions may be reciprocally perpetuating, whereas in other cases they might be promoted by common elements. These include growth factors and inflammatory immune processes that have been implicated in various mental illnesses and neurological disorders, as well as heart disease, diabetes, stroke, cancer, and an array of immune-related conditions. Treatments for many physical illnesses have been advancing, even if a bit slowly, and the potential for still better outcomes have been bolstered by the recognition that a precision (personalized) medicine approach may be instrumental in determining which patients will be most responsive to particular treatments. This perspective opened the door to precision public health that could potentially predict the most efficacious interventions to benefit whole communities or populations. With new perspectives, new approaches, and new technologies, the modes of treatment and their effectiveness are becoming progressively better.
Yet, thereâs another side to mental illnesses that needs to be addressed. Despite many treatment advances, and the understanding that psychiatric disturbances are medical conditions and not a personal failing, attitudes concerning mental illness have considerable stigma attached to them. This is all the more remarkable given that mental illness affects more than 20% of people at some time in their life, which means that an awful lot of families are affected by these illnesses. Itâs hard enough on individuals to deal with their mental illness, but when this is compounded by various forms of stigma, as well as insufficient or ineffective social support, maintaining a positive quality of life becomes much more difficult (Corrigan, Rafacz, & RĂźsch, 2011). If nothing else, reducing the stigmatization of individuals with mental health problems will increase the likelihood that those at risk will seek treatment early.
Aside from public stigma, it isnât unusual for self-stigma to occur, frequently accompanied by shame and humiliation, social devaluation, internalization of a negative self-concept, a need to maintain secrecy (Corrigan, Rafacz, & RĂźsch, 2011) and a decline of help-seeking. If this werenât sufficiently diminishing, individuals with mental health issues frequently have to deal with âstructural stigmaâ which is manifested as inordinately extended waits for treatment as well as a variety of biases when they actually do seek help. Diminished care for other physical illnesses is not uncommon, being misattributed to the manifestation of mental illness. Is it any wonder that life span of patients with mental illness is reduced?
Over the past decade, there has been a decline in overt stigma, possibly reflecting political correctness, but the problem is still extensive. Attempting to âeducateâ people about mental illness has not been especially effective in eliminating stigma (Adams, Lee, Pritchard, & White, 2010). Even health professionals arenât immune from maintaining stigmatizing attitudes concerning mental illness, and they are also likely to self-stigmatize when they experience symptoms of a mental health problem. It isnât unusual for health professionals to have serious concerns about exposing themselves to the judgment of their peers, and they may also be reluctant to seek treatment (Givens & Tjia, 2002). Given that health professionals are affected in this manner, itâs hardly surprising that negative attitudes occur in so many others.
A General Perspective of Mental Illness
Considerable efforts have been devoted to the identification of specific brain regions and neuronal processes that are responsible for the provocation or inhibition of particular behavioral phenotypes. There is merit to this approach, as critical neuronal pathways and brain regions have been identified that contribute to cognitive and emotional functioning, and a variety of behaviors, as well as to mental and neurological illnesses. At the same time, complex behaviors involve complicated neural circuits that wonât readily be discerned by simply assessing single brain regions (Northoff, 2013). Consistent with this perspective, a systems approach is frequently adopted that involves analyses of the functional connectivity among neural circuits that subserve normal behaviors and that of psychological illnesses. It has become increasingly apparent that the activity and functioning of neuronal circuits within the brain are influenced by peripheral and brain hormones, sympathetic nervous system activity, immune factors within the periphery, and immune-like factors that act within the brain (e.g., released by microglia) as well as processes associated with gut bacteria (e.g., Cryan & Dinan, 2012; Dantzer, OâConnor, Freund, Johnson, & Kelley, 2008). In essence, there has been a push toward analysis of mental illnesses within the context of a broader systems-based approach.
This opening chapter introduces multiple systems that may contribute to the evolution of physical, neurological, and psychological disorders, and why some individuals may be more vulnerable (or resilient) to such illnesses. As a particular illness may come about owing to any of several factors, it may be understandable that a treatment that is effective for one individual may not be equally effective for a second. Accordingly, the concept of personalized (precision medicine) treatment strategies are introduced as these have been used for several physical illnesses, and are being incorporated in the treatment of mental health disturbances.
In considering mental illnesses, it is essential to assess not only the diverse processes and mechanisms that are operative within the central nervous system (CNS) itself, but also those apparent across several other systems. The focus in this book is on brain-immune system interactions as they pertain to health, which is consistent with the literature of the past decade or so, wherein inflammatory factors have moved from being a marginal consideration, to one that is a primary player in a range of brain conditions. Indeed, it is now evident that inflammatory immune cells, such as macrophages and microglial cells, and the inflammatory messengers they produce (cytokines), can influence neurotransmission, hormonal release, and even neuronal survival. The involvement of these systems (and their interactions) will be considered in relation to mental health processes as well as comorbid physical illnesses. Finally, genetic, prenatal, and early life experiences, environmental challenges and life-style factors all feed into these illness-related biological processes, and thus need to be considered within any systems-based approach.
It is generally accepted that psychosocial factors, such as early negative life experiences (e.g., parental neglect, abuse), living in poverty, or other types of psychologically toxic environments, together with a failure to cope effectively, would be at or near the top of the list of damaging experiences that can lead to mental illness (Shonkoff, Boyce, & McEwen, 2009). In concert with these psychological stressors are the many other âphysicalâ (neurogenic), systemic, and environmental stressors that affect well-being, including chemical toxicants, industrial contaminants, food additives, and bacterial or viral agents. Given this spectrum of differing challenges, it is easy to get lost in all the specifics, which we wanted to avoid. Thus, we focus on some of the mechanistic commonalities of these varied challenges insofar as they pertain to mental and neurological illness.
Inherent in a systems approach is that in addition to pharmacologically based strategies, psychosocial influences ought to be considered in dealing with at least some psychiatric illnesses (Cruwys, Haslam, Dingle, Haslam, & Jetten, 2014). Moreover, while the treatments of neurodegenerative diseases are obviously not amenable to psychological approaches alone, their comorbid features include depression and anxiety, which may be affected by these treatments. Accordingly, in considering the development and recovery from mental illness, âsystemsâ not only encompass intrinsic biological processes, but also those related to the individual in the context of their social and physical environment, their experiences, and the influence of their ethnic (including cultural) background (Matheson, Bombay, & Anisman, 2018)
In evaluating the multiple factors that are involved in mental illnesses, it is also important to rely on a constellation of âomicsâ that might be used to decipher how diverse systems come together to produce different phenotypes. Piecing together the interactions of multiple biological networks, at different levels of analysis, can provide a fuller picture of whatâs going on in the body (see Table 1.1). Unlike the research conducted a decade or two earlier, data sets are now immense and becoming progressively larger. There are some 3 billion chemical coding units that form an individualâ...