Itās an understatement to say that hiring the right employees is integral to executing strategy effectively. In fact, as Larry Bossidy, retired CEO of AlliedSignal, says, āIn the race, you bet on people, not strategies.ā1 Without the right people, any strategyāno matter how promising or well-designedāwill be rendered useless. With the right people, however, goals get met, strategy gets executed, and organizations soar.
For example, in the service industry, it isnāt the CEOās vision that brings repeat businessāitās the friendliness and helpfulness of the wait staff, desk agents, and parking valets. Bob Ford, a management professor at the University of Central Florida, is fond of saying that at the moment a service is delivered, that one person, that single server, is the organization for the customer. If the car rental clerk loses your reservation, you donāt just blame that clerk, you conclude that the entire company is, at best, mediocre. If that car rental clerk is working for you, then people may conclude that you too accept mediocrity. Consequently, you must pick winnersāthe kind of people who are able to take decisive action consistent with your teamās vision and goals. These high performers are the ones who do great work despite the ambiguity, complexity, and chaos inherent in organizational life.
This chapter focuses on evidence-based methods for selecting high-performing employees who are best suited to the needs of your team. On the basis of empirical research, I recommend four hiring tools, all of which are reliable and valid:2
⢠Situational interviews (SI)
⢠Patterned behavioral description interviews (PBDI)
⢠Job simulations
⢠Realistic job previews
The first three tools are useful in predicting which job applicants will perform at high levels and which will not. The fourth enables people who are offered a job to decide if it is right for them. Managers who adopt these four tools will select winners.
There are two additional tools I am often asked aboutācognitive ability tests and personality tests. They do have some uses, which I explain later, but are less easy to adopt as they require the assistance of a psychologist to administer and score them. I also want to say a few words about emotional intelligence.
WHAT DOESNāT WORK, IN BRIEF
The most commonly used interview technique in organizations todayāa free-flowing conversation, or what researchers call an unstructured interviewāis, ironically, the least effective. The unstructured interview often goes something like this:
āTell me about yourself.ā
āWhere did you go to school?ā
āHow much do you know about our organization?ā
āWhy are you interested in this job opening?ā
āDo you have any questions for me?ā
If you correlate how people perform in an unstructured interview with how they perform on the job, youāll realize you might as well resort to astrology charts.
Many studies, including one in the Journal of Occupational Psychology, show that the correlation between how people are assessed in an unstructured interview and how they are assessed on the job is very low.3 This is because in an unstructured interview for a given job
⢠Different applicants are typically asked different questions
⢠The questions are often not directly related to the job
⢠Interviewers are often unable to agree among themselves what constitutes a great response versus a not-so-great response
If you were to sit in on any hiring panel in the midst of debating possibly acceptable candidatesāwhether in the banking world, the healthcare industry, or the automotive industryāyou would find that the difference of opinion on what constitutes great answers (and great candidates) as revealed by the unstructured interview is tremendous. Hence, the unstructured interview is not very effective for selecting winners. Even though itās a favorite in most organizations, you donāt want to use this interview techniqueāyou have much better alternatives.
WHAT WORKS, IN BRIEF
So throw out the unstructured job interview and replace it with the following research-supported tools for hiring top performers. This combination of tools represents the very best of what research shows about making good hiring decisions.
The situational interview, as the name implies, presents people with situations they will encounter on the job. Hence it is extremely effective at predicting how people will perform in given situations. What people say they will do on the job and how they actually behave on the job turn out to have a significant correlation.
Research has also shown that the patterned behavioral interview, where you ask applicants how they behaved in the past, is a good predictor of how they will behave in the future. This is because a personās past behavior predicts future behavior.
Job simulations test applicants right now, in real time, to see what they can actually do. Simulations have also been backed by many research studies that show them to be effective in predicting job performance (that is, current behavior in a simulated environment predicts subsequent behavior in similar on-the-job situations). One kind of simulation, the assessment center simulation, has been successful in predicting the job promotions and salary progression of people over a twenty-five-year career.
Last, research has revealed the value of a realistic job preview.4 The preview is called realistic because you explain what will be great for an applicant if that person accepts your job offer, and you also explain what job incumbents have found not to be as great. No matter how good your other tools, candidates will always know things about themselves that your selection techniques will not identify. A realistic preview enables candidates to decide whether accepting a job offer is the right decision for them.
EFFECTIVE HIRING TOOLS IN PRACTICE
These first four tools provide a reliable and valid evidence-based package for identifying and then hiring high-performing employees. The following sections offer practical information on how to use these tools so that you can create a winning team.
The Situational Interview
The situational interview assesses an applicantās intentions for dealing with situations likely to arise on the job.5 Given the clear relationship between intentions and subsequent behavior at work, the situational interview should be a staple of every evidence-based managerās hiring practices.
A situational interview is structured so that every candidate answers the same job-related questions. In addition, a behavioral scoring guide made up of illustrative answers is used to assess each applicantās answer to a question. This type of interview ensures that
⢠Managers get good job-related information from the candidates
⢠Managers have a frame of reference that helps them reliably assess the quality of an intervieweeās response
Most important, each question presents a dilemma, as shown below. It is this dilemma that āforcesā applicants to state what they believe they would actually do on the job (that is, their intentions) rather than telling interviewers what they believe the interviewers are hoping to hear. The situational interview should be conducted by two or more people. The interview panel should include the responsible manager and someone from Human Resources.
For example, the Weyerhaeuser Company needed to staff a pulp mill. As staff psychologist, I held a focus group with supervisors to describe critical situations that hourly workers deal with in such a mill. We turned these situations into āWhat would you do in this situation?ā questions, and we then generated answers that we agreed were highly acceptable, acceptable, or unacceptable. These illustrative answers became our scoring guide. We correlated the scores we gave job applicantsā responses to each situational question with the scores the successful applicants received one year later on the job. Eureka! What they said in the interview correlated with what they did on the job.
The dilemma in each question forces applicants to state what they would actually do on the job.
Creating a Situational Interview
To create a situational interview, take these three steps:
1. Conduct a job analysis.
2. Create situational interview questions that contain a dilemma.
3. Develop a scoring guide.
1. Conduct a job analysis. A job analysis identifies important situations that an applicant will likely encounter on the job. These situations typically revolve around your teamās vision, goals, and strategy. From this analysis, you will be able to develop a series of questions that will help you assess how a candidate will respond to a given challenge. For example, a job analysis for a purchasing manager position might reveal that a purchasing manager has to choose between competing suppliers, minimizing costs, and maximizing a departmentās bottom line.
The best way to do a job analysis for developing a situational interview is to use the critical-incident technique, where managers interview job incumbents to identify the incidents that make the difference between highly effective and not-so-effective performers.6
This job analysis focuses on observable behaviors that job incumbents (the subject matter experts) have seen make the difference between a poor employee and an outstanding one. The critical incident technique allows you to ignore situations that occur routinely. It helps you zero in on situations that can have a significant impact on your teamās vision, goals, and strategy execution, such as dealing with an eleventh-hour maintenance issue on the production line or quickly finding a replacement for a team member who calls in sick.
2. Create situational interview questions that contain a dilemma. Once your job analysis identifies critical incidents, you can design a series of situational questions to assess how job candidates intend to handle such challenges. I typically recommend creating at least ten questions in total.
In the case of the job of purchasing manager, you might design questions that assess candidatesā technical knowledge, leadership ability, ethical behavior, and team-building skills. Bui...