Bimetallic Standard

11 Key excerpts on "Bimetallic Standard"

• 

  eBook - ePub

  Battles for the Standard

  Bimetallism and the Spread of the Gold Standard in the Nineteenth Century

  • Ted Wilson(Author)
  • 2017(Publication Date)
  • Taylor & Francis

    (Publisher)

  In wartime it was not possible to retain commodity convertibility, that is, to keep the currency on a standard, because of the exigencies of war itself: the inevitable shortage of specie which was used to pay for essential matériel, the need to expand the money supply to pay for the war effort in general, and so on. So commodity standards broke down in wartime. But the intention – apart perhaps from the French creators of the assignats and mandats of the revolutionary period – was always to return to convertibility of some kind as soon after the end of the war as possible. Commodity moneys, then, were the general rule and almost all monetary authorities based their currencies on either gold or silver, or both. Where both precious metals were used we often use the term ‘bimetallism’ or ‘dual standard’ to describe them. But therein lies a problem. The term bimetallism is to a large extent governed by the context in which it is used. It has been taken to mean, variously: an ancient system of currency long outdated and discredited; a monetary regime tirelessly promoted by the French in the nineteenth century against the good sense of England and the gold standard; a pitiful nostrum advocated by economic cranks to reverse the worst effects of the ‘Great Depression’ of 1873–96; or a synonym of, if not euphemism for, the American populists who advocated the restoration of silver as an easy means of raising primary-product prices in the Midwest during the late nineteenth century. We shall see also that in a formal sense there are several different kinds of bimetallism according to the geographical extent to which advocates believed the dual standard should be extended and according to what kind of metal ratio (between gold and silver) should be pursued. These varieties of bimetallism are clearly identifiable in economic history but, unfortunately, have never been adequately delineated or labelled either by contemporaries or by historians

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  Money Mischief

  Episodes in Monetary History

  • Milton Friedman(Author)
  • 2017(Publication Date)
  • Mariner Books

    (Publisher)

  Chapter 6 Bimetallism Revisited * Throughout recorded history, monetary systems have generally been based on a physical commodity. Metals have been the most widely used, the precious metals of silver and gold above all. As between them, “silver composed nearly the entire circulating metallic currency of Europe” until at least the late nineteenth century (Martin 1977, p. 642), and also of India and other parts of Asia. Gold was used much less, primarily for high-valued transactions. The rate of exchange between silver and gold was sometimes specified by the authorities, sometimes left to the market. If a legal rate was specified, the result was a bimetallic system (as described in chapter 3) under which an authorized mint stood ready, for anyone who requested it to do so, to turn either silver or gold into coins of designated face value and specified weight and fineness on demand (free coinage). Typically there was a small seignorage charge to cover the cost of minting, though sometimes, as in Great Britain and the United States, there was none. The legal price ratio was determined by the weights assigned to the silver and gold coins. For example, from 1837 to the Civil War, the U.S. gold dollar was defined as equal to 23.22 grains of pure gold, the silver dollar as equal to 371.25 grains of pure silver—or 15.988 times as many grains of silver as of gold, rounded in common parlance to a ratio of 16 to 1. A strictly equivalent way to define a Bimetallic Standard is in terms of a government commitment to buy either gold or silver at a fixed price in money designated as legal tender. For the U.S. example, the corresponding fixed prices were $20.67 per fine ounce of gold and $1.29 per fine ounce of silver. * That remained the legal price of gold until 1933, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt raised it by stages and then fixed it at $35 an ounce in early 1934. There it remained until it was raised to $42.22 in early 1973, the price at which the gold holdings of the U.S

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  Introduction to Economics

  • John Roscoe Turner(Author)
  • 2019(Publication Date)
  • Taylor & Francis

    (Publisher)

  A knowledge of Gresham's law introduces a discussion of bimetallism, for the operation of this law will maintain a fixed ratio between the purchasing powers of gold and silver. Should either metal become cheaper debtors will be eager to pay with it. This will at once increase the demand for the cheaper and lower the demand for the dearer metal, thereby making them equal.

  5. Bimetallism

  means the free coinage of two metals at a fixed ratio, the coins of either being legal tender as the debtor may elect. Monometallism is a monetary system where one metal is given the right of free coinage. Bimetallism as well as monometallism may be thought of as a single standard. Two metals maintained at a parity perform precisely the same functions; they lose their independence in a monetary sense and become one and the same. A country may have the Bimetallic Standard based on gold and silver, and coin other metals, as copper and nickel. Coins of other metals, however, are token and not primary money.

  The common man of this generation thinks of bimetallism as a mere theory—-something nice to talk about but dangerous and unworkable if established. He is not informed that mankind has had far more experience and, may I add, more satisfactory experience with bimetallism than with monometallism and that prior to the nineteenth century no nation definitely adopted monometallism, England broke the rule in 1816, but neither the United States nor European nations followed her example until after 1870. Bimetallism is workable and it is not involved in mystery as many are led to believe. It rests upon a single definite and simple principle which explains the extraordinary permanence of the ratio of exchange of gold and silver under bimetallism.

  6. The compensatory principle

  is the fundamental fact In bimetallism. This principle recognizes two great demands for both gold and silver; their use in the arts and in the coinage of money. The monetary demand is large and any change in it reacts quickly upon the purchasing power of these metals. This very fact—the quick and sensitive response of the purchasing power of these metals to changes in demand—makes ft impossible for either gold or silver, under bimetallism, to fall much below the other, and impossible for them to remain separate in price. After the gold discoveries in California and Australia, John E. Cairnes, the eminent English economist, wrote (and I give this illuminating quotation, because it shows the nature of the compensatory principle): "The crop of gold has been unusually large; the increase in the supply has caused a fall in its value; the fall in its value has led to its being substituted for silver; a mass of silver has thus been disengaged from purposes which it was formerly employed to serve; and the result has been that the two metals have fallen in value together." If, according to Gresham's law, gold tends to drive silver out, less silver and more gold will be used in coinage. This decrease in the demand for silver will lower its purchasing power; this increase in the demand for gold will increase its purchasing power; the result will be a coming together of the two. This interaction of the forces of supply and demand which maintains a fixedness of the ratios between gold and silver is known as the compensatory principle.

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - PDF

  The Golden Age of the Quantity Theory

  • David E.W. Laidler(Author)
  • 2014(Publication Date)
  • Princeton University Press

    (Publisher)

  These factors combined with the continued spread of gold monometallism to generate a slow but steady fall in the gold price level which persisted until the mid-1890s. The silver price level on the other 156 MONETARY THEORY AND INSTITUTIONS hand rose, and, important in the case of Britain, the Indian silver rupee therefore depreciated against the gold pound sterling. Then (as now) it was easy (though not for that reason correct) to argue that price deflation would cause real stagnation, and that a rising exchange rate would lead to a loss of competitiveness on the part of domestic industries. It was hardly surprising that, from the 1870s onwards, the spread of the Gold Standard met vociferous opposi- tion, and that much of that opposition centred around proposals to re-establish an international bimetallic monetary system. The mechanics of bimetallism A bimetallic system is exactly what its name implies, namely one in which money consists of, or is convertible into, either or both of two precious metals rather than one. A crucial characteristic of the system is that the relative price of the metals in their monetary use be fixed. As is generally the case, so in this particular instance, it is one thing to put in place a law establishing a relative price, and quite another to have that price be effective in the market place. The central question which a bimetallic system poses for monetary theory is to describe the circumstances (if any) under which a de jure bimetallic system will be so de facto. A secondary, but also important, question is whether, on the assumption that such a system is indeed viable, it will deliver a greater or lesser degree of price level stability than either gold or silver monometallism. In order to answer these questions with theoretical rigour, one needs a supply and demand apparatus modified to incorporate the stock flow distinction. As we have seen, just such an apparatus was developed by Marshall and Fisher during our period.

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  Interest and Prices

  A Study of the Causes Regulating the Value of Money

  • Knut Wicksell(Author)
  • 2011(Publication Date)
  • Read & Co. Books

    (Publisher)

  We are told that if two commodities are employed as a measure of prices, their value in conjunction must be more stable than of either taken separately. That may be true, but it is improper to proceed by way of the “Law of Large Numbers” when it is a question purely of the transition from the number one to the number two. Circumstances can easily arise under which the Bimetallic Standard of prices would be less stable than gold. Let us imagine—what is, after all, not unthinkable—that we have now reached the lowest point of the downward movement of prices, and that the continual production of gold and the excess of bank reserves must necessarily tend to depress the money rate of interest and force up prices. In the immediate future, however, fairly stable prices might be attained, inasmuch as new countries, such as Austria, Russia, 1 and perhaps finally India, may turn over to gold coinage. But the introduction of bimetallism, even at a moderate ratio, would under such conditions bring about a continual, and perhaps very considerable, rise in prices, with all the associated disadvantages. The same essential considerations apply to the “composite standard” or “symmetalism” proposed by Marshall, Edgeworth, and others. Under this system, a country’s, or the world’s, coinage would consist of a mixture in certain proportions of gold and silver. The system would not even have the merit of avoiding fluctuations in the rate of foreign exchange with silver countries. L. Walras has proposed a method, 2 not really bimetallism at all, which theoretically is less objectionable. He would maintain the use of gold as a standard, and he would not permit the free coinage of silver; but silver is to be used as a billon régulateur, the size of the stock of monetary silver being managed according to circumstances, with the object of achieving the highest possible degree of constancy of the value of money in terms of commodities

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - PDF

  International Macroeconomics

  • Peter J. Montiel(Author)
  • 2015(Publication Date)
  • Wiley-Blackwell

    (Publisher)

  Thus the price ratio between silver and gold was 15:1 (ounces of silver per ounce of gold). Why did the United States adopt a Bimetallic Standard? As mentioned above, one reason is that it was not practical to mint gold coins of small enough denomination to be useful for everyday transactions. Since a silver coin of the same weight would be worth only one- fifteenth as much as a gold coin, the minting of silver coins met the demand for small- denomination coinage. However, Bimetallic Standards are inherently unstable. The international price of gold increased at the end of the 18th century, and other countries that adopted a Bimetallic Standard after the Napoleonic Wars (1803–15) consequently did so with a higher silver/gold ratio (15.5:1) than prevailed in the United States. The result was to make gold more valuable in foreign mints than in the United States. 7 The first paper money in what would become the United States was issued by the colony of Massachusetts in 1690. The Classical Gold Standard 119 The predictable result of this situation was for gold to flow out of the United States and silver to flow in. To make a payment abroad in foreign exchange, for example, US residents found it cheaper to acquire the foreign exchange by shipping gold rather than silver overseas (since gold was cheaper in the United States, a smaller dollar value of gold than of silver was required to obtain a given quantity of foreign exchange). Foreign residents, in turn, preferred to ship silver to the United States, because by doing so it cost them less in foreign currency to make a given payment in dollars. The result was that gold flowed out of the United States while silver flowed in, causing the latter to replace the former in circulation. Thus, the United States ended up on a de facto monometallic (silver) standard. The US Congress tried to rectify things in 1834, raising the mint ratio to 16:1 by raising the price of gold to $20.67 per ounce.

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  Monetary Standards and Exchange Rates

  • Maria Cristina Marcuzzo, Lawrence H. Officer, Annalisa Rosselli, Maria Cristina Marcuzzo, Lawrence H. Officer(Authors)
  • 2002(Publication Date)
  • Taylor & Francis

    (Publisher)

  de jure); France was on bimetallism; and the Northern European countries were on the silver standard. These zones had their respective centres in London, Paris and Hamburg, where three key currencies were freely exchanged: the pound sterling, the franc and the mark (or the schilling, before 1828). And finally, there was in each of these zones, side by side with the circulation of specie, a circulation of banknotes convertible into specie; exceptional (though persistent) circumstances even led to the inconvertibility of Bank of England banknotes.

  These characteristics make the period in question an interesting subject for a historical study for at least three reasons. First of all, there were fundamental debates going on at the time about the theory of money and exchange, and the effects on the exchange of the existence of two standards instead of one were variously understood. For Tooke, the comparison between a country with a monometallic standard and a country with a bimetallic one shows that the movements of the exchange with a third country (whatever its standard) are always larger in the latter one (Tooke 1848, 3:217). Goschen maintains that the movements of the exchange rate between a country with a monometallic standard and a country with a bimetallic one are circumscribed to a band determined by the standard they have in common (Goschen 1861:82). Juglar states that the band of exchange variations of a country with a Bimetallic Standard is narrower against a country with a monometallic standard than against a country with a bimetallic one (Juglar 1874:211). Our analysis will cast doubts on the rightness of these opinions.

  A second reason to study that period is to put in a different perspective the accepted theories on exchange rates under a metallic standard, which were chiefly influenced by the observation of the generalized gold-standard period after 1873.2 And third, the study of this tripolar international monetary system may contribute to a more detailed analysis of monetary and exchange regimes.3

  We shall limit our present investigations to the state of exchange between London and Paris from 1796 to 1873. To our knowledge, there exist no published series of prices of precious metals and exchange rates in London and Paris that appeared more than once a week, as would be required for the analysis of the adjustment processes. We therefore had to construct these long series on the basis of the original data. The first results of our analysis were published in Boyer-Xambeu, Deleplace and Gillard (1994b). In Boyer- Xambeu, Deleplace and Gillard (1995), we publish these figures with detailed commentaries.4

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  Economists in Parliament in the Liberal Age

  (1848–1920)

  • Marco E.L. Guidi, Massimo M. Augello(Authors)
  • 2017(Publication Date)
  • Routledge

    (Publisher)

  Worthy of note, in this regard, is his article commenting on a gathering of the Bimetallic League held in Manchester in April 1988. It was Taguchi’s contention that British cotton manufacturers, seeking to recoup the losses they had suffered in the wake of destruction of the stable exchange rate between gold and silver, were aiming to raise general prices by depreciating the value of their currency. 29 Yet such a move, Taguchi claimed, totally failed to take into account that the purpose of the Bimetallic Standard lay in stabilising general prices. Taguchi espoused a conception of bimetallism that contrasted with an inflationist point of view: ‘Economists in the European gold standard countries advocate the international Bimetallic Standard for the fear of a further decline of prices. But I commit myself to the international Bimetallic Standard to avoid the rise of rice price produced by an anticipated further decline of silver price’. 30 As the price of rice formed the general basis for prices in Japan at that time, what Taguchi most greatly feared was that the decline in the price of silver would trigger a rise in general prices driven by an increase in the price of rice. He was convinced that raising prices due to currency depreciation would eventually destroy the economic equilibrium. To avert such a risk and achieve stabilisation of the economy, he believed the most appropriate measure would be the adoption of a bimetallic monetary system. Although this recommendation might seem implausible to staunch advocates of the gold standard, Taguchi remained firmly convinced that the gold standard constituted a system that would destroy the balanced economic order that was essential if free trade was to flourish and produce the greatest benefits of its functioning

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  In Search of Stability

  Economics of Money, History of the Rupee

  • Sashi Sivramkrishna(Author)
  • 2016(Publication Date)
  • Routledge

    (Publisher)

  the rate between them determined by the market ; a currency system called a parallel standard. But this system had a limitation; in a market with constant fluctuations in the exchange rate between gold and silver one could end up incurring losses unless the variations were fully known. The more appropriate alternative it seemed was bimetallism where both metals could circulate as coin but with the government fixing the rate (or ratio) of exchange between them.

  Using Irving Fisher’s (1912) articulation of gold and silver money as ‘substitutes, but have no natural ratio of substitution’ (p. 377) I have tried to describe these currency systems graphically using a simple demand-supply model. While supply of money is considered fixed at a point of time, the demand curves will typically be downward sloping. This is because as price of one metal falls with respect of the other it will be substituted for the other at least in the arts (non-monetary usages). Whether it will also be substituted for the other as money depends on whether a parallel standard or bimetallism is in existence. Consider Country CP on a parallel standard where both gold and silver circulate as money at an exchange rate determined by the market. The gold and silver bullion markets are at equilibrium with demand equal to supply at (say) G/S = 15, i.e. 1G = 15S or S/G = 1/15 as shown in Figure 1.3 (a) and 1.3 (b) respectively. Suppose gold supply increases from SG to SG ’. This would put pressure on the silver price of gold to fall from 15 towards (say) 14 as the excess supply gets absorbed for non-monetary purposes. But will substitution of silver money by the cheaper gold take place? Suppose a cup of tea had cost 1G = 15S before gold prices fell to 14S. If gold is the accepted unit of account, then the price of tea remains at 1G so that you pay either 1G or 14S for it. If instead silver is the unit of account, the tea price remains at 15S so you must pay either 15S or 1.07G (as per the new rate of 1G = 14S) for it. Gold will not replace silver as coin. However, as shown in Figure 1.3 (a), the fall in the silver price of gold would result in an increase in quantity demanded of gold from G0 to G1

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - PDF

  Financial Missionaries to the World

  The Politics and Culture of Dollar Diplomacy, 1900–1930

  • Emily S. Rosenberg, Gilbert M. Joseph(Authors)
  • 2004(Publication Date)
  • Duke University Press Books

    (Publisher)

  In 1896 the forces of free silver, led by William Jennings Bryan, captured the Democratic party and made the currency question the most emotional issue in the election. The bitter 1896 electoral controversies, centering on whether the country would have a gold or a bimetal standard, drew heavily on profes-sional-managerial and antibanking discourses. Republican presidential candidate William McKinley and others who advocated the gold stand-ard identified their sound-money policies with the “civilized” world. Because industrial countries, most notably England, based their curren-cies on gold, those who were interested in emulating or cementing ties with Europe favored the gold standard. Pro-gold advocates stressed that a monometallic standard, based on gold, was a prerequisite for maintain-ing a predictable economic environment and developing a sound bank-ing system and credit markets. Because of the continually fluctuating prices between gold and silver, they argued, an established exchange ratio between gold and silver would be impossible to maintain, and bi-metallism would probably, in fact, mean a silver standard for the United States. Silver-based currencies, they claimed, were characteristic only of “backward” lands in Asia and Latin America. The “silverites” turned these arguments on their heads. To them, the 10 Financial Missionaries to the World civilized standard represented plutocracy; gold benefited the money-lenders and the international financiers. Coinage of silver, allowed in the Bimetallic Standard, meant adequate circulating medium for the com-mon people. Opponents of the gold standard also recognized the interna-tional dimension of the controversy; they stressed that the biggest mar-kets for the United States would eventually be found in silver-standard countries of Latin America and Asia. 12 The election of 1896 became one of the most heated in U.S.

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book
• 

  eBook - ePub

  Gold and the Gold Standard

  The Story of Gold Money, Past, Present and Future

  • Dr. Edwin Walter Kemmerer(Author)
  • 2018(Publication Date)
  • Papamoa Press

    (Publisher)

  He pointed out that we had had long experience with a currency in which there was only a small amount of gold coin, but that we had had very little experience with a currency in which there was a dearth of silver coins. The inconvenience of the former, he said, had been slight but that of the latter would be serious. He thought that, if our silver coins should be drained off, their value would be supplied not by gold, but by small bank notes and tokens—“the worst species of paper currency.” {107} In opposition to the silver monometallists, advocates of the gold standard held that gold was preferable to silver as the standard money metal. They maintained that it was more stable in value and that, under a gold-standard system, silver could be kept in circulation in adequate quantities by the expedient of restricting the coinage of silver and of making silver coins token money with limited legal tender. They pointed to the success of the gold standard in England, with its token silver coinage, and to the desirability of our having a standard conforming to that of the country with which we carried on our largest trade. The arguments of the gold monometallists were strengthened by the fact that, about that time, some gold discoveries were made in Georgia and North Carolina, which created in those sections special and local interests favorable to gold. Bimetallism Continued Nonetheless, the majority of thinking people still favored bimetallism, which appeared to them to be succeeding in France and which they believed had not been given a fair trial in the United States. It had long been recognized that the mint ratio of 15 to 1 adopted by the United States in 1792 had soon thereafter fallen below the market ratio and also below the mint ratio of France. Agitation in favor of raising our mint ratio in order to restore our gold circulation became increasingly strong after 1828

  Sign up to read

  Learn more about book