Part One
CORE CONCEPTS The Coachâs Stance
1
AN INTRODUCTION TO EXECUTIVE COACHING
Coach: What are the most pressing business challenges you face?
Leader: Weâve got to get our division out of the cellar. Consistently we perform behind the other four divisions, and the CEOâs patience with us is wearing thin. I donât think heâs going to put up with it much longer.
Coach: How much time have you got?
Leader: At the outside, maybe twelve months.
Coach: What obstacles prevent you from getting the results that you want?
Leader: My executive team isnât operating as a unit. Theyâre pursuing their own business goals, not coordinating overlapping interests with other departments. In our meetings, when I ask for their opinions, they address issues only in their functional area. Weâre not doing any creative problem solving.
Coach: What impacts do these disappointing results have on you personally?
Leader: I have to work two jobs: my own and the vacancy on my team. In my first year as senior vice president, I had three positions in a row vacated, and itâs taken too long to fill each one. Itâs like trying to drive a car with one wheel constantly missing: it prevents me from looking at the big picture.
Coach: This sounds like a great setup for self-perpetuating burnout, for both you and your team. Youâll never get the results you need to succeed if you donât carve out the space to lead your team.
Leader: So tell me how to do it when Iâm fighting fires!
Coach: You may, by default, be managing only what you know how to do rather than doing what is needed. You may need to go beyond your own leadership strengths to achieve significantly different, breakthrough results. What is challenging for you about this situation in the face of these disappointing results?
Leader: Leading this effort is a big challenge for me. Itâs the first time Iâve ever managed multiple functions. Iâve never spent energy on managing as a discipline in itself. I achieve success through technical know-how. I could use some help figuring out where to start.
Coach: Letâs start by defining more specifically which actions on the part of your team would directly lead to the results you need. Then we can look at how you will achieve those results with your team.
Leaders hold a special position in the landscape of change. A leaderâs clarity of purpose and her ability to connect the people in her organization to that purpose go a long way toward mobilizing the necessary forces for change. Sometimes executives need help to fulfill the responsibilities of their special position. Executive coaches, who understand the demands and requirements of the change process, can help these leaders.
Leaders hold a special position in the landscape of change.
What would you do if the leader from the preceding dialogue were referred to you for coaching? What would be your goal with him? What would you want to accomplish? How would you determine if you were being effective?
These are the questions that effective coaches ask themselves every time they enter a new coaching relationship. They are also the questions that keep coaches, even experienced ones, up at night when the client or the situation reaches a particularly dicey phase.
A well-managed coaching relationship, along with an adequate period of time and a motivated executive, can lead to impressive results. That was the case for this leader, whose division became the top performer in the company within eight months.
This book explores how to think and act in ways that empower the executives you coach. It will help you become a valued resource to the leaders who need you most.
What Is Executive Coaching?
The coaching partnership begins when the leader faces a dilemma and feels stymied. The essence of executive coaching is helping leaders work through challenges so they can transform their learning into results for the organization.
Coaches possess the trained yet natural curiosity of a journalist or an anthropologist to the clientâs work situation. In addition, coaches typically:
⢠Share conceptual frameworks, images, and metaphors with executives.
⢠Encourage rigor in the ways that clients organize their thinking, visioning, planning, and expectations.
⢠Challenge executives to expand their learning edge and go beyond their current level of competence.
⢠Build clientsâ capacities to manage their own anxiety in tough situations.
By âexecutive,â I mean leaders who are in the top and upper levels of their organizations: the CEOs, senior vice presidents, plant managers, and executive directors of organizations. I define the executiveâs job in three broad areas:
1. Communicating the territory, that is, the purpose, the vision, and goals of the organization to key constituencies, as well as outlining opportunities and challenges.
2. Building commitment, building relationships, and facilitating interactions that result in outstanding team performance.
3. Producing results and outcomes through the direct efforts of others as well as the executiveâs own efforts.
Executive coaching is the process of increasing the clientâs effectiveness in meeting these three responsibilities. For example, in the opening story, the executive was clear about the third responsibility: the results. He even had a sense about what was missing in the second area: the interactions he needed from his team. But he had yet to act on that knowledge: he was not defining the expectations he had for his team. Neither was he communicating to his team, with any conviction, the territory ahead and his vision for where they needed to go.
Some of you coach one-to-one with leaders exclusively. Others, myself included, use coaching as one tool in the toolbox used for larger organizational change projects with leaders (see Appendix D). Although my practice encompasses larger change efforts, this book focuses largely on the one-to-one executive coach work relationship because it is so critical.
It is easy to assume that this coaching relationship happens in isolation from the dynamics of the executiveâs team. Of course, it does not, even when you coach only the leader. Whether coaching the executive happens with the team or independently, that relationship must take into account the team and the organization. One of the purposes of executive coaching is to turn the leader toward his team so he can lead them more effectively. This approach can enhance the contributions of both the leader and the team.
I do wish to acknowledge the special concerns of executives at the very top of their organizations. Top executives deal with issues of stockholders, owners or partners, succession, loyalty, strategic alliances, and positioning in the marketplace. Many believe that they should not ask for help, which exacerbates their âlonely at the topâ experience.
The biggest difference I find in coaching top executives as opposed to middle executives is one of tone and pace. Top executives require more toughness from those who partner with them. By toughness, I mean knowing when to sacrifice tact for directness to reach the punch line sooner. Although the pace is quicker and the tone may be blunter with top executives, the coaching approach of this book works well for middle executives too.
How to Be the Most Hard-Nosed Businessperson in the Room
For as much as American and Western culture corporations have the reputation for being tough-minded and bottom-line oriented, too many organizational customers of executive coaching services invest in coaching with less rigor and outcome focus than they should. Organizations deserve to see a return on the investment they make in their executives through coaching. I make sure that I am seen as a business partner with my clients by sticking to these parameters regarding my work:
⢠Refuse to be satisfied with executive coaching as âfinishing school.â
⢠Refuse to undertake an initiative that has no business measures associated with it.
⢠Refuse to be a substitute for your clientâs boss.
By âfinishing school,â I mean those vague requests for coaching that come because someoneâs boss said she needed to âdevelop more executive presence,â or âprepare herself for the next level of management,â or âIâm not sure what my boss meant, he just said that coaching might benefit me.â There needs to be an established need for coaching expressed in ways that mobilize the client toward a specific goal.
Attaching business measures to a coaching effort makes clear the connection between investment in the executive and the return that the organization will receive. It goes well beyond finishing school and starts delivering two-for-one results for organizations: they get both a developed leader and greater bottom-line results with the same investment dollars.
Everyone is overworked in the business environment, clientsâ bosses included. I do not blame bosses for wanting to offload some of their supervisory work onto their subordinatesâ coaches. It is just that I do not let them succeed at their attempts to do it. Executive coaching is not a substitute for performance management. The executive coach is an adjunct resource, not a replacement for the boss-direct report relationship.
Executive coaching is not a substitute for performance management.
Four Essential Ingredients of Executive Coaching
Letâs revisit the coach-executive conversation at the beginning of this chapter. The coachâs sequencing of questions reveals four essential ingredients of executive coaching. The first ingredient is maintaining a results orientation to a leaderâs problem (âWhat are the most pressing business challenges you face? ... How much time have you got?â) To lose sight of outcomes is to waste the leaderâs time, money, and energy. The organization needs him to stay focused on what will produce the key goods, services, or information that define that organizationâs success. A coachâs job is to support the leaderâs drive for results.
The second ingredient is partnership. The coach becomes a partner in the executiveâs journey toward greater competence and effectiveness. During the conversation (and in the question, âWhat obstacles prevent you from getting the results that you want?â), the coach begins to stand shoulder to shoulder with the executive in untangling and assessing the many factors, forces, and dilemmas facing the leader. Within this collegiality, the coach inquires, stimulates, and challenges the leader to perform at his optimal level.
The third ingredient is the ability to engage the specific leadership challenges that the executive faces (âWhat is challenging for you about this situation in the face of these disappointing results?â). This helps him explore what drives him off course and what he typically avoidsâfor example, seeing the waves he creates for others as he works through his agenda. Leaders naturally resist concentrating on their own actions while looking to others for results. Within the coaching partnership, the coach confronts the executive to look at the ways in which he may be his own worst enemy and thus prevent himself from achieving the results he wants.
In the fourth ingredient, the coach links team behaviors to the bottom-line goals and points out the need for executives to set specific expectations for their teams. (âLetâs start by defining more specifically which actions on the part of your team would directly lead to the results you need.â) This is an essential connection. Coaches help clients define specifically the people processes that are most relevant to the business goals. They keep leaders focused on their results orientation but also widen their view of what their teams need to do to get there. It is important in the conversation linking results to team behaviors that the leaderâs responsibility remains central (note the coachâs last comment in the dialogue: âThen we can look at how you will achieve those results with your teamâ).
Core Principles That Guide Executive Coaching
When I coach executives, I adhere to three core values or principles. When diligen...