Durrheim, Mtose, and Brown acknowledge here how arguments attributing the perpetuation of inequality to the opinions of individuals en masse allow scholars to “ignore structural factors” and provide “little understanding of the social patterning” that allows inequality to proliferate — inequality with an impact and reach beyond the scope of the actions of disorganized social groups. It is only with structures in place, such as segregation through apartheid, which inform the running of businesses, schools, and healthcare institutions that inequality can disadvantage entire communities so completely.
Recognizing how an individual can benefit from or be disadvantaged by multiple structures of inequality, we can begin to understand experiences under structural inequality to be intersectional in nature. Through the concept of intersectionality (sometimes referred to as intersectional feminist theory), scholars argue that the lived experience of navigating a world with multiple identity characteristics means often, where two or more of these characteristics intersect in the context of navigating inequality, that intersection can create a unique form of sociopolitical identity which is more than a sum of its parts. We could use intersectionality to describe, for example, the unique struggles faced by African-American women who are structurally disadvantaged both as women and as African-Americans in the US, and face particular hurdles contingent on being African-American women, not just African-American and a woman. Understanding the intersectional nature of structural inequality allows us to grasp how one system of structural inequality can support the maintenance of another, disadvantaging individuals from intersectional backgrounds disproportionately to their peers. You can read our study guide on Intersectionality to learn more about its conception, research applicability, and social impact.
Significant texts on structural inequality
If you are interested in learning more about the mechanisms behind the emergence and maintenance of structural inequalities, Durable Inequality (1998) by Charles Tilly is essential reading. Tilly, regarded as one of the “founding fathers” of twenty-first century sociology, provides invaluable insight into social inequalities in this manifesto, written to be applied to the analysis of all cases of inequality between social categories. Tilly also unpacks how social categories are created and what exploitation of these inequalities looks like using various historical examples. Durable Inequality is also indexed so that readers interested in Tilly’s writings on a particular social group, historical period, or fellow scholar of inequality can better find relevant content.
For scholars interested in learning how we measure the impacts of structural inequality, Intersectional Inequality: Race, Class, Test Scores, and Poverty (2016) by Charles C. Ragin and Peer C. Fiss is a text which narrows the gap between inequality-focused social theory and pragmatic sociological research. Centered around the research methodologies developed over the course of sociologist Ragin’s career, this publication also employs an intersectional approach. Ragin’s approaches to analyzing intersecting structures of inequality are effective, impactful, and contingent on developments in sociological theory in the last decade which have better addressed the complex and subjective nature of inequality as a predictor for other sociopolitical research outcomes.
Histories of Global Inequality: New Perspectives (2019), edited by Christian Olaf Christiansen and Steven Jensen, is a text more in line with Mauro Magatti’s historically-dependent definition of structural inequality. Focused on the events which established structures of inequality, this collection confronts the socioeconomic aftermath of social phenomena such as colonialism, utilizing historical case studies to better contextualize existing structures of inequality across the globe. For academics approaching structural inequality from a standpoint informed by geography or international relations, this text is a valuable guide.
Understanding structural inequality can allow us to better identify when blame is incorrectly placed on individuals for systems of injustice and discrimination beyond the scope of their influence. Recognizing the historical and sociopolitical contexts of structural inequality empowers academics and activists to confront structural inequality at its source, recontextualizing the actions of individuals as part of larger systems. As a key theme in many interdisciplinary theories of social behavior and political injustice, structural inequality is a crucial component in our comprehension of effective social justice.
Further resources and reading on Perlego
Inequality: An Entangled Political Economy Perspective (2018) by Mikayla Novak
The Globalization of Inequality (2017) by François Bourguignon and Thomas Scott-Railton
The Economics of Inequality (2015) by Thomas Piketty
Power and Inequality: Critical Readings for a New Era (2021) edited by Levon Chorbajian
Understanding Inequalities: Stratification and Difference (2019) by Lucinda Platt
Globalization, Poverty and Inequality: Between a Rock and a Hard Place (2013) by Raphael Kaplinsky